W. J. Abernathy and J. M. Utterback, Patterns of industrial innovation, Technology Review, vol.80, issue.7, 1978.

I. Adelman, T. Morris, and C. , A Factor Analysis of the Interrelationship Between Social and Political Variables and Per Capita Gross National Product, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.79, issue.4, pp.555-578, 1965.
DOI : 10.2307/1880652

N. Aggarwal, Q. Dai, and E. A. Walden, The More, the Merrier? How the Number of Partners in a Standard-Setting Initiative Affects Shareholder's Risk and Return, MIS Quarterly, vol.35, issue.2, pp.445-462, 2011.

R. Aoki and S. Nagaoka, The consortium standard and patent pools, The Economic Review, vol.55, issue.4, pp.346-356, 2004.

R. Aoki and A. Schiff, Promoting access to intellectual property: patent pools, copyright collectives, and clearinghouses, R&D Management, vol.37, issue.2, pp.1467-9310, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.01.002

A. Arora, M. Ceccagnoli, and W. M. Cohen, R&D and the patent premium, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.26, issue.5, pp.1153-1179, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.11.004

K. Arrow, Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, NBER Chapters, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp.609-626, 1962.

W. B. Arthur, Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events, The Economic Journal, vol.99, issue.394, pp.116-131, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/2234208

Y. Balcer and S. Lippman, Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.34, issue.2, pp.292-318, 1984.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0531(84)90146-7

R. Bekkers, U. Gsm, and E. Tetra, Mobile Telecommunications Standards, 2001.

R. Bekkers, R. Bongard, and A. Nuvolari, An empirical study on the determinants of essential patent claims in compatibility standards, Research Policy, vol.40, issue.7, pp.1001-1015, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.004

R. Bekkers, C. Catalini, A. Martinelli, T. Simcoe, G. Duysters et al., Intellectual Property Disclosure in Standards Development Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure. The case of GSM, Conference Proceedings of the NBER conference on Standards, Patents & Innovation Bekkers R Research Policy, pp.31-1141, 2002.

R. Bekkers and A. Martinelli, Knowledge positions in high-tech markets: Trajectories, standards, strategies and true innovators, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.79, issue.7, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.009

M. Benner and J. Waldfogel, Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity, Research Policy, vol.37, issue.9, pp.1556-1567, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.011

F. Berger, K. Blind, and N. Thumm, Filing behaviour regarding essential patents in industry standards, Research Policy, vol.41, issue.1, pp.216-225, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.004

S. Besen and . J. Farrell, Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.8, issue.2, pp.117-131, 1994.
DOI : 10.1257/jep.8.2.117

J. Bessen, Estimates of patent rents from firm market value, Research Policy, vol.38, issue.10, pp.1604-1616, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.014

J. Bessen, Patent Thickets: Strategic Patenting of Complex Technologies, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2004.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.327760

J. Bessen, The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics, 2006.

J. Bessen and R. Hunt, An Empirical Look at Software Patents, Research on Innovation Working Paper No, pp.3-17, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00136.x
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.107.1228

J. Bessen and E. Maskin, Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation, Economics Working Paper, pp.0-01, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00081.x
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.175.7986

K. Blind, . Theory, . Evidence, . Policy, E. Cheltenham et al., Factors Influencing the Lifetime of Telecommunication and Information Technology Standards, International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, vol.5, issue.1, pp.1-24, 2004.
DOI : 10.4018/jitsr.2007010101

K. Blind, R. Bekkers, Y. Dietrich, E. Iversen, B. Müller et al., Trends in ICT standards: The relationship between European standardisation bodies and standards consortia, ICT standards: The relationship between European standardization bodies and standards consortia, pp.503-513, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.telpol.2008.05.004

K. Blind and N. Thumm, Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications, Research Policy, vol.33, issue.10, pp.1583-1598, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2004.08.007

N. Bloom, M. Schankerman, and J. Van-reenen, Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry, 2010.
DOI : 10.3386/w13060
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.407.1758

R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and F. Windmeijer, Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics, vol.87, issue.1, pp.115-143, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

L. Branstetter and M. Sakakibara, When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data, American Economic Review, vol.92, issue.1, pp.143-159, 2002.
DOI : 10.1257/000282802760015649

T. Bresnahan and S. Greenstein, Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.47, issue.1, pp.1-40, 1999.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6451.00088

A. Bryson, R. Dorsett, S. Purdon, M. Kopeinig, and S. , The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of labour market policies, Working Paper No. 4, Department for Work and Pensions Caliendo, Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching, pp.31-72, 2002.

C. Cargill, Intellectual Property Rights and Standards Setting Organizations: An Overview of failed evolution, 2002.

B. Chiao, J. Lerner, and J. Tirole, The rules of standard-setting organizations: an empirical analysis, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.1, issue.4, pp.905-930, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00118.x

J. P. Choi, Network Externality, Compatibility Choice, and Planned Obsolescence, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.42, issue.2, pp.167-182, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/2950488

J. Choi, PATENT POOLS AND CROSS-LICENSING IN THE SHADOW OF PATENT LITIGATION*, International Economic Review, vol.34, issue.2, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2010.00587.x

J. Choi, C. M. Christensen, and J. L. Bower, Patent Pools and Innovation Incentives, Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms, pp.197-218, 1996.

C. M. Christensen, F. F. Suárez, and J. M. Utterback, Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries, Management Science, vol.44, issue.12-part-2, pp.44-207, 1998.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.44.12.S207

G. M. Clarkson, Objective Identification of Patent Thickets: A Network Analytic Approach for Measuring the Density of Patent Space, Inefficient Standard Adoption: Inertia and Momentum Revisited, pp.507-518, 2004.

W. Cohen, R. Nelson, J. M. Walsh, and A. Gawer, Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not The elements of platform leadership, NBER Working paper Cusumano, pp.51-58, 2000.

P. David and M. Shurmer, Formal standards-setting for global telecommunications and information services. Towards an institutional regime transformation?, Telecommunications Policy, vol.20, issue.10, pp.789-815, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0308-5961(96)00060-2

D. Bijl, P. Goyal, and S. , Technological change in markets with network externalities, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.13, issue.3, pp.307-325, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-7187(94)00457-D

H. Delcamp, Essential Patents in Pools: Is Value Intrinsic or Induced?, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp.2011-2012
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1617186

H. Delcamp, Are patent pools a way to help patent owners enforcing their rights?, pp.2011-2013

H. Delcamp and A. Leiponen, Innovating Standards Through Informal Consortia: The Case of Wireless Telecommunications, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01111055

V. Dequiedt and B. Versaevel, Pools and the Dynamic Incentives to R&D. Working paper, under: http://ssrn, p.988303, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00142497

G. Dosi, Technological paradigms and technological trajectories, Research Policy, vol.11, issue.3, pp.147-162, 1982.
DOI : 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6

N. Economides, The economics of networks, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.14, issue.6, pp.673-699, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-7187(96)01015-6

T. M. Egyedi, Consortium Problem Redefined, International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, vol.1, issue.2, pp.22-38, 2003.
DOI : 10.4018/jitsr.2003070102

T. Egyedi and P. Heijnen, Scale of Standards Dynamics: Change in formal, international IT standards ? The Standards Edge: Future Generation, 2005.

J. Farrell and P. Klemperer, Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects, Handbook of Industrial Organization, pp.1967-2072, 2007.

J. Farrell and G. Saloner, Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.16, issue.1, pp.70-83, 1985.
DOI : 10.2307/2555589

J. Farrell and G. Saloner, Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation, American Economic Review, vol.76, issue.5, pp.940-955, 1986.

J. Farrell and G. Saloner, Coordination through Committees and Marekts, Journal of Economics, vol.19, issue.2, pp.235-252, 1988.

J. Farrell and T. Simcoe, Four Paths to Compatibility, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195397840.013.0002

J. Farrell and T. Simcoe, Choosing the Rules for Consensus Standardization, RAND Journal of Economics, 2012.

L. Fleming and D. Waguespack, Scanning the Commons? Evidence on the Benefits to Startups Participating in Open Standards Development, Management Science, vol.55, issue.2, 2008.

R. Fontana, A. Nuvolari, and B. Verspagen, Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol.24, issue.4, pp.311-336, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.001

S. Gauch, Dynamics and effects of competing standards of recordable DVD-media, The dynamics of standards, pp.47-67, 2008.

R. Garud, S. Jain, and A. Kumaraswamy, INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA., Academy of Management Journal, vol.45, issue.1, pp.45-46, 2002.
DOI : 10.2307/3069292

B. Ganglmair and E. Tarantino, Patent Disclosure in Standard Setting, Conference Proceedings of the NBER conference on Standards, Patents & Innovation, 2012.

A. Gawer and M. Cusumano, Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation, 2012.

D. Geradin, Standardization and Technological Innovation: Some Reflections on Exante Licensing, FRAND, and the Proper Means to Reward Innovators, World Competition, vol.29, pp.511-534, 2006.

R. J. Gilbert, Anti-Trust for Patent Pools: A Century of Policy Evolution, Stanford Technology Law Review, vol.3, 2004.

R. Gilbert, The essentiality test for patent pools, Working within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property, 2009.

J. Giummo, Should All Patentable Inventions Receive Equal Protection? Identifying the Sources of Heterogeneity in Patent Value, 2003.

Z. Griliches, Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of economic literature, vol.28, issue.4, pp.1661-1707, 1990.
DOI : 10.3386/w3301

B. H. Hall, A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look, 2000.
DOI : 10.3386/w7741

B. H. Hall, A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools, NBER Working Paper No, 2001.

B. H. Hall, A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, Market value and patent citations, RAND Journal of Economics, vol.36, pp.16-38, 2005.
DOI : 10.3386/w7741
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.23.5764

B. H. Hall and R. H. Ziedonis, The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.32, issue.1, pp.101-128, 2001.
DOI : 10.2307/2696400

D. Harhoff, F. Narin, F. M. Scherer, and K. Vopel, Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.511-515, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/2555502

D. Harhoff, G. Von-graevenitz, and S. Wagner, Incidence and Growth of Patent Thickets -The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Complexity, 2008.

R. Hawkins, The rise of consortia in the information and communication technology industries: emerging implications for policy, Telecommunications Policy, vol.23, issue.2, pp.159-173, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0308-5961(98)00085-8

J. Heckman, H. Ichimura, and P. Todd, Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator, Review of Economic Studies, vol.65, issue.2, pp.261-294, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00044

J. Heckman, J. Robert, J. Lalonde, and J. S. Smith, The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labour Market Programs, The Handbook of Labour Economics, 1999.

T. Iizuka, An Empirical Analysis of Planned Obsolescence, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, vol.17, issue.1, pp.16-17, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00137.x

A. Jaffe and J. Lerner, Innovation and Its Discontents, 2004.
DOI : 10.2202/1932-0213.1006

A. M. Joshi and A. Nerkar, 2011-1): When do strategic alliances inhibit innovation by firms? Evidence from patent pools in the global optical disc industry, Strategic Management Journal, vol.32, issue.11, pp.1097-0266

A. Joshi and A. Nerkar, 2011-2): Which Technologies Get Put Up for Sale and Why? Knowledge Asset Recombinations as a Predictor of Outbound Licensing, Journal of Marketing

M. Katz and C. Shapiro, Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities, Journal of Political Economy, vol.94, issue.4, pp.822-841, 1986.
DOI : 10.1086/261409

M. Katz and C. Shapiro, Product Introduction with Network Externalities, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.40, issue.1, pp.55-84, 1992.
DOI : 10.2307/2950627

C. P. Kindleberger, Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods, Kyklos, vol.113, issue.3, pp.377-397, 1983.
DOI : 10.2307/1925895

E. Kitch, The Nature and Function of the Patent System, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol.20, issue.2, pp.265-290, 1977.
DOI : 10.1086/466903

P. Klemperer, How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be?, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.21, issue.1, pp.113-130, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/2555498

E. Kristiansen, R&D in the Presence of Network Externalities: Timing and Compatibility, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.29, issue.3, pp.531-547, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/2556103

R. Lampe and P. Moser, Do Patent Pools Encourage Innovation? Evidence from the Nineteenth-Century Sewing Machine Industry, The Journal of Economic History, vol.1, issue.04, pp.898-920, 2010.
DOI : 10.2307/3480996

R. Lampe and P. Moser, Patent Pools and Innovation in Substitutes -Evidence from the 19th Century Sewing Machine Industry, 2011.

R. Lampe, P. J. Moser, A. Pakes, and J. Putnam, Do Patent Pools Encourage Innovation. Evidence from the eight industries in the 1930ies How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.XLVI, issue.4, pp.405-433, 1998.

J. Lanjouw and M. Schankerman, The quality of ideas: measuring innovation with multiple indicators, 1999.
DOI : 10.3386/w7345

J. Lanjouw and M. Schankerman, Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators*, The Economic Journal, vol.2, issue.1, pp.114-441, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/0048-7333(94)90050-7

A. Layne-farrar, Innovative or Indefensible?, International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, vol.9, issue.2, pp.1-18, 2008.
DOI : 10.4018/jitsr.2011070101

A. Layne-farrar and J. Lerner, To join or not to join: Examining patent pool participation and rent sharing rules, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.29, issue.2, pp.294-303, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.08.006

A. Layne-farrar, G. Llobet, and J. Padilla, Payments and Participation: The Incentives to Join Cooperative Standard Setting Efforts, Working Paper Leiponen Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications, A. Management Science, issue.11, pp.54-1904, 2008.

M. Lemley, Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations, California Law Review, vol.90, issue.6, pp.1889-1980, 2002.
DOI : 10.2307/3481437

M. Lemley and C. Shapiro, Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking, Texas Law Review, vol.81, pp.1991-2044, 2006.

. Lerner and T. Strojwas, The design of patent pools: the determinants of licensing rules, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.26, issue.3, pp.611-625, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00103.x

J. Lerner and J. Tirole, Efficient Patent Pools, American Economic Review, vol.94, issue.3, pp.691-711, 2004.
DOI : 10.1257/0002828041464641

J. Lerner and J. Tirole, A Model of Forum Shopping, The American Economic Review, vol.96, issue.4, pp.1091-1113, 2006.
DOI : 10.1257/000282806779468526

F. Lévêque and Y. Ménière, Patent pool formation: Timing matters, Information Economics and Policy, vol.23, issue.3-4, pp.243-251, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2011.07.002

S. Liebowitz and S. Margolis, Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.11, issue.1, pp.205-231, 2005.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1706450

K. Liu, J. Arthurs, J. Cullen, and R. Alexander, Internal sequential innovations: How does interrelatedness affect patent renewal? Research Policy, pp.946-953, 2008.

G. Llanes and S. Trento, Patent policy, patent pools, and the accumulation of claims in sequential innovation, 2010.

C. Matutes and C. Regibeau, Compatibility and Bundling of Complementary Goods in a Duopoly, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.40, issue.1, pp.37-50, 1992.
DOI : 10.2307/2950626

G. Mcgrath and A. Nerkar, Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms, Strategic Management Journal, vol.25, issue.1, pp.1-21, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/smj.358

R. P. Merges and R. Nelson, On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope, Columbia Law Review, vol.90, issue.4, pp.839-916, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/1122920

S. Metcalfe and I. Miles, Standards, selection and variety: an evolutionary approach, Information Economics and Policy, vol.6, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-6245(94)90004-3

S. S. Nagaoka, N. Tsukada, and T. Shimbo, Patent quality, cumulative innovation and market value: Evidence from Japanese firm level panel data. IIR Working Paper 05-06. Institute of Innovation Research The structure and the emergence of essential patents for standards: Lessons from three IT standards, Schumpeterian perspectives on innovation, competition and growth, pp.435-450, 2005.

M. Noel and M. Schankerman, Strategic Patenting and Software Innovation, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.50, issue.6, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/joie.12024
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.167.8022

G. Parchomovsky and R. Polk-wagner, Patent Portfolios, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol.154, issue.1, pp.1-54, 2005.
DOI : 10.2307/25047582

G. Park and Y. Park, On the measurement of patent stock as knowledge indicators, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.73, issue.7, pp.793-812, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.006

R. Peters, One-Blue: a blueprint for patent pools in high-tech, Intellectual Asset Management, pp.38-41, 2011.

T. Pohlmann, Attributes and Dynamic Development Phases of Informal ICT Standards Consortia, TUB Working Paper, 2010.

T. Pohlmann and K. Blind, Cooperate to Declare. Firms' cooperative activities as driving factors of patent declaration on technological standards, TUB working paper, 2012.

J. M. Putnam, The value of international patent rights Improving patent valuations for management purposes -validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales, Research Policy, vol.33, pp.939-957, 1996.

P. Rosenbaum, The Role of a Second Control Group in an Observational Study, Statistical Science, vol.2, issue.3, pp.292-306, 1987.
DOI : 10.1214/ss/1177013232

M. Rysman and . T. Simcoe, Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations, Management Science, vol.54, issue.11, pp.1920-1934, 2008.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0919

M. Rysman and . T. Simcoe, A NAASTy alternative to RAND pricing commitments, Telecommunications Policy, vol.35, issue.11, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.07.003

D. Salant, Formulas for Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory Royalty Determination, International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, vol.7, issue.1, pp.66-75, 2009.
DOI : 10.4018/jitsr.2009010105

K. M. Schmidt, Standards, Innovation Incentives, and the Formation of Patent Pools, 2010.

C. Shapiro, Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patents Pools, and Standard Setting, Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2001.

T. Simcoe, Explaining the Increase in Intellectual Property Disclosure, in Standards Edge: The Golden Mean, pp.260-295, 2007.

T. Simcoe, Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms, American Economic Review, vol.102, issue.1, pp.305-336, 2012.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.102.1.305

J. Smith and P. Todd, Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?, Journal of Econometrics, vol.125, issue.1-2, pp.305-353, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011

F. Suarez, NETWORK EFFECTS REVISITED: THE ROLE OF STRONG TIES IN TECHNOLOGY SELECTION., Academy of Management Journal, vol.48, issue.4, pp.710-720, 2005.
DOI : 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17843947

D. Swanson and W. Baumol, Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (RAND) Royalties, Standards Selection, and Control of Market Power, Antitrust Law Journal, p.73, 2005.

G. Tassey, Standardization in technology-based markets, Research Policy, vol.29, issue.4-5, pp.587-602, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00091-8

G. Thoma, S. Torrisi, A. Gambardella, D. Guellec, B. H. Hall et al., Harmonizing and Combining Large Datasets ? An Application to Firm-Level Patent and Accounting Data, 2010.
DOI : 10.3386/w15851
URL : http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0019-B2FD-C

P. Thomas, The Effect of Technological Impact upon Patent Renewal Decisions, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol.3, issue.2, pp.181-197, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/1912835

M. Trajtenberg, 1990-1): A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations, RAND Journal of Economics, vol.21, issue.1, pp.171-187

M. Trajtenberg, ): Economic Analysis of Product Innovation: The Case of CT Scanners, 1990.

M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson, and A. Jaffe, University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol.76, issue.1, pp.19-50, 1997.
DOI : 10.2307/2555502

N. Van-zeebroeck and B. Van-pottelsberghe-de-la-potterie, The vulnerability of patent value determinants, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol.55, issue.3, pp.283-308, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.11.008

V. Graevenitz, G. Wagner, S. Harhoff, and D. , How to measure patent thickets: a novel approach, Discussion Papers in Business Administration 10962, 2009.

K. Wajima, A. Inuzuka, and T. Watanabe, Empirical Study on Essential Patents in DVD and MPEG Patent Pools, IAM Discussion Paper Series #016, 2010.

M. Waldman, A New Perspective on Planned Obsolescence, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.108, issue.1, pp.273-84, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/2118504

T. Weitzel, D. Beimborn, and W. König, A unified economic model of standard diffusion: The impact of standardization cost, network effects and network topology, MIS Quarterly, vol.30, pp.489-514, 2006.

J. West, How open is open enough?, Research Policy, vol.32, issue.7, pp.1259-1285, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0

J. West and J. Dedrick, Innovation and Control in Standards Architectures: The Rise and Fall of Japan's PC-98, Information Systems Research, vol.11, issue.2, pp.197-216, 2000.
DOI : 10.1287/isre.11.2.197.11778