A. Sen, Interpersonal Aggregation and Partial Comparability, Econometrica, vol.38, issue.3, pp.393-409, 1970.
DOI : 10.2307/1909546

J. E. Roemer, Theories of distributive justice, 1998.

J. C. Harsanyi, Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility, Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation, pp.6-23, 1976.

T. M. Scanlon, Rawls' Theory of Justice, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol.121, issue.5, pp.1020-1069, 1973.
DOI : 10.2307/3311280

S. S. Stevens, On the theory of scales of measurement. Bobbs-Merrill, College Division, 1946.

F. S. Roberts, Measurement theory with applications to decisionmaking, utility, and the social sciences, 1984.

M. Mandler, Cardinality versus ordinality: A suggested compromise The American economic review, pp.1114-1136, 2006.

A. K. Sen, Collective choice and social welfare, 1970.

C. Aspremont and L. Gevers, Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.44, issue.2, pp.199-209, 1977.
DOI : 10.2307/2297061

C. Aspremont and L. Gevers, Chapter 10 Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability, Handbook of social choice and welfare, vol.1, pp.459-541, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80014-5

W. Bossert and J. A. Weymark, Utility in Social Choice, Handbook of utility theory, pp.1099-1177, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_7

C. Blackorby, W. Bossert, and D. Donaldson, Chapter 11 Utilitarianism and the theory of justice, Handbook of social choice and welfare, vol.1, pp.543-596, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80015-7

S. J. Brams and P. C. Fishburn, Chapter 4 Voting procedures, Handbook of social choice and welfare, vol.1, pp.173-236, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80008-X

S. J. Brams and P. C. Fishburn, Approval voting, The American Political Science Review, pp.831-847, 1978.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00119047

S. J. Brams and P. C. Fishburn, Approval voting, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00119047

B. Balinski and R. Laraki, Majority judgement: measuring, ranking and electing, 2010.

W. D. Smith, Range voting Available electronically on http, 2000.

S. J. Brams and M. R. Sanver, Voting systems that combine approval and preference , " in The mathematics of preference, choice and order, pp.215-237, 2009.

A. Kirman and M. Teschl, On the emergence of economic identity, pp.59-86, 2004.

J. B. Davis, Individuals and identity in economics, Cambridge Books, 2010.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511782237

J. Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1879.
DOI : 10.1093/oseo/instance.00077240

M. Fleurbaey, M. Salles, and J. A. Weymark, Justice, political liberalism, and utilitarianism: themes from Harsanyi and Rawls, 2008.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511619595
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00246415

R. John, A theory of justice. Cambridge, 1971.

N. Baigent, BEHIND THE VEIL OF PREFERENCE, The Japanese Economic Review, vol.6, issue.1, pp.88-101, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/2554418

A. Sen, Welfare inequalities and Rawlsian axiomatics, Theory and Decision, vol.4, issue.4, pp.243-262, 1976.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00135080

H. S. Richardson and P. J. Weithman, The philosophy of Rawls: A collection of essays, 1999.

W. Gaertner, A Primer in Social Choice Theory: Revised Edition: Revised Edition, 2009.

P. J. Hammond, Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle, Econometrica, vol.44, issue.4, pp.793-804, 1976.
DOI : 10.2307/1913445

S. Strasnick, Arrow's paradox and beyond, 1975.

C. Hillinger, The Case for Utilitarian Voting, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2005.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.732285

F. T. Aleskerov, D. Yuzbashev, and V. I. Yakuba, Threshold aggregation of the three-graded rankings, Automation and Remote Control, vol.68, issue.1, pp.133-138, 2007.
DOI : 10.1134/S0005117907010122

G. Laffond and J. Lainé, Does choosing committees from approval balloting fulfill the electorates will?, Handbook on Approval Voting, pp.125-150, 2010.

M. Sanver, Approval as an Intrinsic Part of Preference, Handbook on Approval Voting Studies in Choice and Welfare, pp.469-481, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_20

A. E. Roth and M. A. Sotomayor, Two-sided matching: A study in game-theoretic modeling and analysis, 1992.
DOI : 10.1017/CCOL052139015X

B. Erdamar, J. L. García-lapresta, D. Pérez-roman, and M. R. Sanver, Measuring consensus in a preference-approval context Information Fusion, 2012.

J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi, A ???human-consistent??? degree of consensus based on fuzzy login with linguistic quantifiers, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.18, issue.3, pp.275-290, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0165-4896(89)90035-8

W. J. Tastle and M. J. Wierman, Consensus and dissention: A measure of ordinal dispersion, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.45, issue.3, pp.531-545, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2006.06.024

J. G. Kemeny, Mathematics without numbers, Daedalus, vol.88, issue.4, pp.577-591, 1959.

G. Beliakov, T. Calvo, and S. James, On Penalty-Based Aggregation Functions and Consensus, Consensual processes, pp.23-40, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_2

L. E. Susskind, S. Mckearnen, and J. Thomas-lamar, The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Sage, 1999.

D. Straus, How to make collaboration work: Powerful ways to build consensus, solve problems, and make decisions, 2002.

M. Van-den and . Belt, Mediated modeling: a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building, 2004.

M. Martínez-panero, Consensus Perspectives: Glimpses into Theoretical Advances and Applications, Consensual Processes, pp.179-193, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_11

M. Kendall and J. D. Gibbons, Rank correlation methods edward arnold A division of Hodder, pp.29-50, 1990.

W. L. Hays, A Note on Average Tau as a Measure of Concordance, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.39, issue.290, pp.331-341, 1960.
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1960.10482068

J. Alcalde-unzu and M. Vorsatz, Measuring Consensus: Concepts, Comparisons, and Properties, Consensual Processes, pp.195-211, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_12

R. Bosch, Characterizations on voting rules and consensus measures, 2006.

J. L. García-lapresta and D. Pérez-román, Measuring Consensus in Weak Orders, Consensual Processes, pp.213-234, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_13

J. L. Garci, D. Lapresta, and . Pérez-román, Consensus measures generated by weighted kemeny distances on weak orders, Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA) 10th International Conference on, pp.463-468, 2010.

S. J. Brams and M. R. Sanver, Voting systems that combine approval and preference , " in The mathematics of preference, choice and order, pp.215-237, 2009.

M. R. Sertel and B. Y?lmaz, The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.16, issue.4, pp.615-627, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/s003550050164

A. E. Kara and M. R. Sertel, Does majoritarian approval matter in selecting a social choice rule? An exploratory panel study, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.16, issue.1, pp.43-73, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-005-0024-8

R. W. Hamming, Error Detecting and Error Correcting Codes, Bell System Technical Journal, vol.29, issue.2, pp.147-160, 1950.
DOI : 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1950.tb00463.x

W. D. Cook, M. Kress, and L. M. Seiford, A general framework for distance-based consensus in ordinal ranking models, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.96, issue.2, pp.392-397, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00322-3

D. Eckert and C. Klamler, Distance-Based Aggregation Theory, Consensual Processes, pp.3-22, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_1

J. L. García-lapresta and D. Pérez-román, SOME CONSENSUS MEASURES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN GROUP DECISION MAKING, Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control, pp.611-616, 2008.
DOI : 10.1142/9789812799470_0100

B. Erdamar, M. R. Sanver, and S. Sato, On manipulation from an unaccepted social choice to an acceptable one

B. Salvador, Chapter twenty-five-strategyproof social choice, Handbook of social choice and welfare, vol.2, pp.731-831, 2011.

A. Gibbard, Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result, Econometrica, vol.41, issue.4, pp.587-601, 1973.
DOI : 10.2307/1914083

M. A. Satterthwaite, Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.10, issue.2, pp.187-217, 1975.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2

N. Baigent, Manipulability of choice aggregations, Economics Letters, vol.38, issue.2, pp.195-198, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0165-1765(92)90053-2

B. Ju, Collective Choice for Simple Preferences, Handbook on Approval Voting, pp.41-90, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_4

S. Sato, A sufficient condition for the equivalence of strategy-proofness and nonmanipulability by preferences adjacent to the sincere one, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.148, issue.1, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2012.12.001

S. Sato, Strategy-proofness and the reluctance to make large lies: the case of weak orders, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.10, issue.2, pp.479-494, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-011-0616-4

M. Vorsatz, Approval Voting on Dichotomous Preferences, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.45, issue.1, pp.127-141, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-006-0149-4

S. Sato, Circular domains, Review of Economic Design, vol.70, issue.3-4, pp.331-342, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s10058-010-0102-y