A. , R. Nnnnnnn, G. Nnnnnnn, C. Hhhhhh, and A. , Textual entailment through extended lexical overlap, Proceedings of RTE-2 Workshop, 2006.

A. , R. Nnnnnnn, G. Nnnnnnn, C. Hhhhhh, and S. , Textual entailment through extended lexical overlap and lexico-semantic matching, Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, RTE '07, pp.119-124, 2007.

A. , I. Mmmmmmmmm, and P. , A survey of paraphrasing and textual entailment methods, J. Artif. Int. Res, vol.38, pp.135-187, 2010.

B. , C. F. Ffffffff, C. J. Ll, and J. B. , The berkeley framenet project, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp.98-86, 1998.

B. , R. Llllll, E. Fffffffff, Ó. Mmmm, A. Ppppppp et al., The dlsiuaes team's participation in the tac 2008 tracks, Proceedings of the Text Analysis Conference, 2008.

B. , M. &. Bbbbb, and E. , Scaling to very very large corpora for natural language disambiguation, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '01, pp.26-33, 2001.

B. , R. Mmkk, and K. R. , Sentence fusion for multidocument news summarization, Comput . Linguist, vol.31, pp.297-328, 2005.

B. , S. Bbbbbb, J. Fffff, L. Hhhhhhhhh, J. &. et al., Mitre's submission to the eu pascal rte challenge, PASCAL. Proc. of the First Challenge Workshop. Recognizing Textual Entailment, pp.41-44, 2005.

B. , J. Hhhhh, and A. , Workshop: Application of lcc's groundhog system for rte-4, Proceedings of the Text Analysis Conference, 2008.

B. , L. Dd, I. Dddd, H. T. Ggggggggggg, D. Mm et al., The fifth pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge, Proc Text Analysis Conference (TAC'09, 2009.

B. , J. Mmmmmm, and K. , When logical inference helps determining textual entailment (and when it doesn't), Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, 2006.

B. , J. Ooo, and T. , A spoken language interface with a mobile robot, Artificial Life and Robotics, vol.11, pp.42-47, 2007.

B. , P. F. Pppppp, V. J. Pppppp, V. J. Mmmmmm, and R. L. , Word-sense disambiguation using statistical methods, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.264-270, 1991.

C. , C. Dddd, and M. , Creating speech and language data with amazon's mechanical turk, Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk, CSLDAMT '10, pp.1-12, 2010.

C. , J. Q. Dd, I. Mm, B. Bbb, and F. D. , Machine Learning Challenges, Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification and Recognizing Textual Entailment, First PASCAL Machine Learning Challenges Workshop, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3944, 2005.

C. , G. Mmccccccc-ggggg, and S. , Meaning and grammar): an introduction to semantics, 2000.

C. , Y. Kkkkk, T. Nnnnnnn, and E. , Automatic retrieval of frequent idiomatic and collocation expressions in a large corpus, Journal for Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol.4, pp.34-38, 1983.

C. , G. Dddd, G. Llllll, and V. , Modélisation prétopologique pour la structuration sémantico-lexicale, Proceedings of the 17èmes Rencontres de la Société Francophone de Classification, 2010.

C. , G. Bbbbbbbb, D. Llllll, V. Dddd, G. et al., A pretopological framework for the automatic construction of lexical-semantic structures from texts Gate: an architecture for development of robust hlt applications, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '02, pp.2453-2456, 2002.

D. , I. Gggggggg, and O. , Probabilistic textual entailment: Generic applied modeling of language variability, Learning Methods for Text Understanding and Mining, 2004.

D. , I. Mmmmmm, S. Mmmmm, and S. , Contextual word similarity and estimation from sparse data, Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '93, pp.164-171, 1993.

D. , I. Ppppppp, F. Lll, and L. , Similarity-based estimation of word cooccurrence probabilities, Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '94, pp.272-278, 1994.

D. , I. Gggggggg, O. Mm, and B. , The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification and Recognizing Textual Entailment, First PASCAL Machine Learning Challenges Workshop, Machine Learning Challenges Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3944, pp.177-190, 2005.

D. , I. Ddddd, B. Mm, B. &. , and D. , Recognizing textual entailment: Rational, evaluation and approaches, Natural Language Engineering, vol.15, p.i?xvii, 2009.

D. , I. , R. , D. Sssssss, M. &. Zzzz et al., Recognizing textual entailment: Models and applications, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, vol.6, pp.1-220, 2013.

D. , J. Gggggggg, and M. , The relationship between precision-recall and roc curves, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '06, pp.233-240, 2006.

B. , M. Gg, D. Mmmm, M. J. , V. et al., Clustering and summarizing medical documents to improve mobile retrieval, 2008.

D. , R. , T. , S. Bbbbbbb, A. P. Bbbb et al., Venses ? a linguisticallybased system for semantic evaluation, Proceedings of the First PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, pp.49-52, 2005.

D. , G. References-ggggggggggg, D. Mm, B. Dd, I. Ddddd et al., Extraction Automatique d'Associations Lexicales à Partir de Corpora The fourth pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge, Proceedings of the Text Analysis Conference, 2002.

G. , O. Dd, and I. , Web based probabilistic textual entailment, Proceedings of the 1st Pascal Challenge Workshop, pp.33-36, 2005.

G. , R. Hhhhhhhhh, L. Nnnn, and N. T. , Discovery procedures for sublanguage selectional patterns: initial experiments, Comput. Linguist, vol.12, pp.205-215, 1986.

H. , S. Hhhhh, and A. , Methods for using textual entailment in open-domain question answering, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-44, pp.905-912, 2006.

H. , S. M. Mmmmmm, G. A. Mmmmm, and D. I. , WordNet 2 ? a morphologically and semantically enhanced resource, Proceedings of SigLex99: Standardizing Lexical Resources, pp.1-8, 1999.

H. , J. Ppppp, and F. , Textual entailment recognition based on dependency analysis and wordnet, Proceedings of the 1st. PASCAL Recognision Textual Entailment Challenge Workshop. Pattern Analysis, Statistical Modelling and Computational Learning, 2005.

H. , A. Bbbbbbb, and J. , A discourse commitment-based framework for recognizing textual entailment, Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, RTE '07, pp.171-176, 2007.

H. , A. Bbbbbbb, J. , W. , J. et al., Recognizing textual entailment with lcc's groundhog system, Proc. of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop, 2006.

H. , W. J. Ddd, L. Ggg, and P. , The georgetown-i.b.m. experiment, pp.124-135, 1955.

I. , R. B. Dd, I. Ddddd, B. Fffff, L. Ggggggggggg et al., The second pascal recognising textual entailment challenge, 2006.

I. , A. Bbbbbbb-dddddddd, and A. , Hypothesis transformation and semantic variability rules used in recognizing textual entailment, Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, RTE '07, pp.125-130, 2007.

I. , A. Mmmmm, and M. A. , UAIC Participation at RTE5. Proceedings of, 2009.

J. , J. Ccccc, and D. , Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy, 1997.

K. , Y. Eeeeeee, and S. , Learning similarity-based word sense disambiguation from sparse data, 1996.

K. , M. &. Mm, and B. , Recognizing textual entailment with tree edit distance algorithms, In PASCAL Challenges on RTE, pp.17-20, 2005.

K. , S. Lllllll, and R. , On information and sufficiency, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol.22, pp.79-86, 1951.

L. , J. R. Kkkk, and G. G. , The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data, Biometrics, vol.33, pp.159-174, 1977.

L. , F. Zzzzz, Z. Bb, F. Tttt, Y. Zzz et al., Thu quanta at tac 2009 kbp and rte track, Proc. of the Text Analysis Conference, 2009.

L. , D. Pppppp, and P. , Dirt -discovery of inference rules from text, Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp.323-328, 2001.

L. , K. Bbbbbbb, C. &. , and R. , Semantic and associative priming in high dimensional semantic space, Cognitive Science, pp.660-665, 1995.

M. , C. D. Sssssss, and H. , Foundations of statistical natural language processing, 1999.

M. , M. P. Mmmmmmmmmmmmm, M. A. Ssss, and B. , Building a large annotated corpus of english: the penn treebank, Comput. Linguist, vol.19, pp.313-330, 1993.

M. , W. Aa, and P. , On the processing of a text corpus: From textual data to lexicographical information, Lexicography: Principles and Practice, Applied Language Studies Series, 1983.

M. , Y. Mmmmmmmmm, R. Zzzz, and F. M. , Semker: Syntactic/semantic kernels for recognizing textual entailment, Proc. of the Text Analysis Conference, 2009.

M. , M. Ppppp, J. Ppppp, L. Ppppp, and M. , The jensen-shannon divergence, Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol.334, pp.307-318, 1997.

M. , L. Eeee, S. Sssssss, and H. , Asymmetric association measures, Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pp.1-6, 2007.

M. , R. Tttt, and P. , Textrank: Bringing order into texts, Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2004.

M. , G. A. Lll, C. , T. , R. Bbbbbb et al., A semantic concordance, Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology, HLT '93, pp.303-308, 1993.

M. , S. Sss, L. Cccccccc, N. Dd, I. Dd et al., Source-language entailment modeling for translating unknown terms, Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pp.791-799, 2009.

N. , R. .. Wwww, W. Mmm, and J. .. , Recognizing entailment in intelligent tutoring systems*, Nat. Lang. Eng, vol.15, pp.479-501, 2009.

O. , F. J. Nnn, and H. , A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models, Comput. Linguist, vol.29, pp.19-51, 2003.

O. , H. Tttttt, and K. , Real time extraction of related terms by bi-directional lexicosyntactic patterns from the web, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, pp.441-449, 2009.

R. Ppp, J. Hhhhh, P. Ss, R. Sss, A. Ggggg et al., The TIMEBANK corpus, Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2003, pp.647-656, 2003.

R. , E. Ssssssss, and J. , A corpus-based approach for building semantic lexicons, Proceedings of the Second Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp.117-124, 1997.

R. , A. Ppppp, and F. , Overview of the answer validation exercise, Proceedings of the 9th Cross-language evaluation forum conference on Evaluating systems for multilingual and multimodal information access, CLEF'08, pp.296-313, 2008.

R. , L. Kkkkkkkk, M. &. Ssssss, and I. , Investigating a generic paraphrase-based approach for relation extraction, EACL '06, 2006.

R. , D. Sssssss, M. &. Vvvvvv, and V. , A framework for entailed relation recognition, Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pp.57-60, 2009.

S. , M. Vvvvvv, V. G. , V. , T. Jjjjj et al., Relation alignment for textual entailment recognition, 2009.

S. , M. &. Ccccc, and B. , Deriving concept hierarchies from text, Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '99, pp.206-213, 1999.

S. , M. &. Ll, and D. , Building, testing, and applying concept hierarchies, Advances in Information Retrieval, vol.7, pp.235-266, 2000.

. Résumé, Depuis 2005, dans la Textual Entailment reconnaissance tâche (RTE), les systèmes sont appelés à juger automatiquement si le sens d'une portion de texte, le texte -T, implique le sens d'un autre texte, l'hypothèse -H. Cette thèse nous nous intéressons au cas particulier de l'implication, l'implication de généralité. Pour nous, il ya différents types d'implication, nous introduisons le paradigme de l'implication textuelle en généralité, qui peut être définie comme l'implication d'une peine spécifique pour une phrase plus générale