Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation

Effets des sensibilisants sur la synthèse de la prostaglandine E2 : Mécanismes et intérêt dans la prédiction de l’allergie de contact

Abstract : Contact sensitizers are defined as reactive molecules (electrophilic) which have the ability to modify skin proteins to form an antigen (hapten). In addition to the haptenation mechanism, danger signals, leading to the activation of dendritic cells, are described to be crucial for the effective induction of an hapten-specific T cell immune response. In the context of the 7th amendment to the Cosmetic Directive, the cosmetic industry is concerned by the challenge of finding non-animal approaches to assess the sensitizing potential of chemicals. While danger signals induced by sensitizers in steady-state conditions have already been analyzed, we chose to investigate the impact of sensitizers on the course of an inflammatory response. For this purpose we used the U937 cell line differentiated with PMA and activated with LPS. In these conditions, cells produce a large amount of inflammatory mediators (IL-β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, IL-8, PGE2, PGD2, TxB2) through the activation of pathways leading to the activation of the transcription factors NF-κB and Nrf2 and through AA metabolism by the cPLA2/COX-2 cascade. Interestingly, we showed that 6 contact sensitizers with various potential (DNCB, PPD, HQ, PG, CIN, EUG) significally and specifically decrease the production of prostanoïds and in particular of PGE2 induced by PMA/LPS. We further demonstrated that there is no unique inhibition profile of the sensitizers even if the majority (except for DNCB) of the effects applies on COX-2 (i.e. inhibition of the expression and/or activity). For DNCB, inhibition mechanism appears to be dependant of its capacity to react with thiols residues and in particular to deplete intracellular glutathione possibly leading to the inactivation of the PG-synthases. In parallel, we assess a statistical analysis on 160 molecules that allow us to define the test parameters (a molecule is a sensitizer if the PGE2 inhibition at 24h is more than 60%) and to calculate the test performance toward LLNA (78%). Moreover we demonstrated that the PGE2 test could be complementary to other already existing in vitro tests like MUSST or Nrf2-HTS. In summary, we add here a new insight into the multiple biochemical effects described so far for sensitizers. Even if the underlying biological relevance remains unclear, the parameter “PGE2 inhibition” is good test for skin sensitization evaluation. Further studies will precise how this parameter could be implemented into an alternative testing strategy for the evaluation of skin sensitization.
Document type :
Complete list of metadatas
Contributor : Abes Star :  Contact
Submitted on : Monday, June 30, 2014 - 4:24:19 PM
Last modification on : Friday, October 23, 2020 - 5:04:30 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - 4:00:13 PM


Version validated by the jury (STAR)


  • HAL Id : pastel-01016611, version 1
  • PRODINRA : 314224



Aurelia del Bufalo. Effets des sensibilisants sur la synthèse de la prostaglandine E2 : Mécanismes et intérêt dans la prédiction de l’allergie de contact. Médecine humaine et pathologie. AgroParisTech, 2012. Français. ⟨NNT : 2012AGPT0003⟩. ⟨pastel-01016611⟩



Record views


Files downloads