E. Amiran and D. Hagen, Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Comment, American Economic Review, vol.93, issue.1, pp.458-463, 2003.
DOI : 10.1257/000282803321455430

I. Bateman, A. Munro, B. Rhodes, C. Starmer, and R. Sugden, A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.112, issue.2, pp.479-505, 1997.
DOI : 10.1162/003355397555262

R. Boyce, T. Brown, G. Mcclelland, G. Peterson, and W. Schulze, An Experimental Examination of Intrinsic Values as a Source of the WTA-WTP Disparity, American Economic Review, vol.82, pp.1366-1373, 1992.

C. Blackorby, D. Primont, and R. Russell, Duality, Separability and Functional Structure, Theory and Economic Applications, 1978.

D. Brookshire and D. Coursey, Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures, American Economic Review, vol.77, pp.554-556, 1987.

P. Cook and D. Graham, The Demand for Insurance and Protection: The Case of Irreplaceable Commodities, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.91, issue.1, pp.143-156, 1977.
DOI : 10.2307/1883142

G. Chapman, Similarity and reluctance to trade, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol.11, issue.1, pp.47-58, 1998.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199803)11:1<47::AID-BDM278>3.0.CO;2-B

A. Deaton, The Distance Function in Consumer Behaviour with Applications to Index Numbers and Optimal Taxation, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.46, issue.3, pp.391-405, 1979.
DOI : 10.2307/2297009

U. Ebert, Exact welfare measures and economic index numbers, Zeitschrift f???r National???konomie Journal of Economics, vol.49, issue.1, pp.27-38, 1984.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01283962

U. Ebert, A note on willingness to pay and willingness to accept, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.10, issue.4, pp.363-370, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00182511

W. Hanemann, Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Reply, American Economic Review, vol.93, issue.1, pp.635-647, 1991.
DOI : 10.1257/000282803321455449

W. Hanemann, The Economic Theory of WTP and WTA " , In Valuing the Environment Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC and Developing Countries, 1999.

J. Hicks, The Four Consumer's Surpluses, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.11, issue.1, pp.31-41, 1943.
DOI : 10.2307/2967517

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Loss aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.106, pp.1039-1061, 1979.

D. Kahneman, J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler, Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.5, issue.1, pp.193-206, 1991.
DOI : 10.1257/jep.5.1.193

J. Knetsch and J. Sinden, Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.99, issue.3, pp.507-521, 1984.
DOI : 10.2307/1885962

K. Mäler, ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS, 1974.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-0-08-040816-3.50011-9

G. Morrisson, Resoving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: Comment, American Economic Review, vol.87, pp.236-240, 1997.

H. Park, Randall and stoll's bound in an inverse demand system, Economics Letters, vol.56, issue.3, pp.281-286, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00166-3

D. Putler, Incorporating Reference Price Effects into a Theory of Consumer Choice, Marketing Science, vol.11, issue.3, pp.287-309, 1992.
DOI : 10.1287/mksc.11.3.287

A. Randall and J. Stoll, Consumer " s Surplus in Commodity Space, American Economic Review, vol.70, pp.449-455, 1980.

B. Sinclair-desgagné, Calcul économique et développement durable, Esprit critique, vol.07, 2005.

R. Thaler, Toward a positive theory of consumer choice, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.1, issue.1, pp.39-60, 1980.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.106, issue.4, pp.1039-1061, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/2937956

J. Horowitz, The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism is not necessarily incentive compatible, even for non-random goods, Economics Letters, vol.93, issue.1, pp.6-11, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.033

D. Kahneman, J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler, Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem, Journal of Political Economy, vol.98, issue.6, pp.1325-1348, 1990.
DOI : 10.1086/261737

J. List and J. Shogren, Price Information and Bidding Behavior in Repeated Second-Price Auctions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.81, issue.4, pp.942-991, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/1244336

J. List, Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.118, issue.1, pp.41-71, 2003.
DOI : 10.1162/00335530360535144
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.319.7232

J. List, Using random nth-Price Auctions to value Non-Market Goods and Services, Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol.23, issue.2, pp.193-205, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1022259014448

J. Lusk and M. Rousu, Market Price Endogeneity and Accuracy of Value Elicitation Mechanisms, Using Experimental Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, 2006.
DOI : 10.4337/9781847203045.00007

J. Lusk, C. Alexander, and M. Rousu, Designing Experimental Auctions for Marketing Research: The Effect of Values, Distributions, and Mechanisms on Incentives for Truthful Bidding, Review of Marketing Science, vol.5, issue.1, pp.1-30, 2007.
DOI : 10.2202/1546-5616.1059

P. Milgrom and R. Weber, A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding, Econometrica, vol.50, issue.5, pp.1089-1122, 1982.
DOI : 10.2307/1911865

C. Plott, Rational individual behavior in markets and social choice processes: the Discovered Preference Hypothesis, Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, 1996.

C. Plott and K. Zeiler, The Willingness to Pay???Willingness to Accept Gap, the ???Endowment Effect,??? Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations, American Economic Review, vol.95, issue.3, pp.530-545, 2005.
DOI : 10.1257/0002828054201387

A. Randall and J. Stoll, Consumer " s Surplus in Commodity Space, American Economic Review, vol.71, pp.449-457, 1980.

R. Sarin and M. Weber, Effects of Ambiguity in Market Experiments, Management Science, vol.39, issue.5, pp.609-615, 1993.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.39.5.602

J. Shogren, S. Shin, D. Hayes, and J. Kliebenstein, Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept, American Economic Review, vol.84, pp.255-270, 1994.

J. Shogren, J. List, and D. Hayes, Preference Learning in Consecutive Experimental Auctions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.82, issue.4, pp.1016-1021, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/0002-9092.00099

J. Shogren, S. Cho, C. Koo, J. List, C. Park et al., Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.23, issue.2, pp.97-109, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0928-7655(00)00038-5

V. Smith, Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology, Journal of Political Economy, vol.99, issue.4, pp.877-897, 1991.
DOI : 10.1086/261782

W. Vickrey, COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS, The Journal of Finance, vol.16, issue.1, pp.8-37, 1961.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x

F. Alfnes and K. Rickertsen, European Consumers' Willingness to Pay for U.S. Beef in Experimental Auction Markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.85, issue.2, pp.396-405, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-8276.t01-1-00128

H. Arkes, D. Hirshleifer, D. Jiang, and S. Lim, Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.105, issue.1, pp.67-81, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.005

R. Aumann, Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.1, issue.1, pp.67-96, 1974.
DOI : 10.1016/0304-4068(74)90037-8

R. Aumann, Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality, Econometrica, vol.55, issue.1, pp.1-18, 1987.
DOI : 10.2307/1911154

M. Baucells, M. Weber, and F. Welfens, Reference-Point Formation and Updating, Management Science, vol.57, issue.3, 2008.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1286

G. Becker, M. Degroot, and J. Marschak, Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method, Behavioral Science, vol.59, issue.3, pp.226-232, 1964.
DOI : 10.1002/bs.3830090304

J. Bernard, Evidence of affiliation of values in a repeated trial auction experiment, Applied Economics Letters, vol.84, issue.11, pp.687-691, 2005.
DOI : 10.2307/1911865

J. Bettman, Processes of Adaptivity in Decision Making, Advances in Consumer Research, pp.1-4, 1988.

H. Bleichrodt and J. Pinto, A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis, Management Science, vol.46, issue.11, pp.1485-1496, 2000.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1485.12086

P. Bohm, J. Linden, and J. Sonnegard, Eliciting Reservation Prices: Becker- DeGroot-Marschak Mechanisms vs. Markets, Economic Journal, vol.107, pp.1079-1089, 1997.
DOI : 10.1111/1468-0297.00207

C. Boutilier, M. Goldszmidt, C. Monteleoni, and B. Sabata, Resource Allocation Using Sequential Auctions, LNCS: Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce II, vol.1788, pp.131-152, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/10720026_8
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.145.9547

H. Chen and A. Rao, Close Encounters of Two Kinds: False Alarms and Dashed Hopes, Marketing Science, vol.21, issue.2, pp.178-196, 2002.
DOI : 10.1287/mksc.21.2.178.148

T. Cherry, T. Crocker, and J. Shogren, Rationality spillovers, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.45, issue.1, pp.63-84, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00008-6

J. Corrigan and M. Rousu, Posted Prices and Bid Affiliation: Evidence from Experimental Auctions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.88, issue.4, pp.1078-1090, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00917.x
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.521.4758

J. Cox and D. Grether, The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets and incentives, Economic Theory, vol.41, issue.3, pp.381-405, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01213657

R. Cubitt, C. Starmer, and R. Sugden, Discovered preferences and the experimental evidence of violations of expected utility theory, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol.8, issue.3, pp.385-414, 2001.
DOI : 10.1080/13501780110103748

R. Cummings and L. Taylor, Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method, American Economic Review, vol.89, issue.3, pp.649-65, 1999.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.89.3.649

A. Dragicevic and D. Ettinger, Private Valuation of a Public Good in Three Auction Mechanisms, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, vol.2, issue.2, 2009.
DOI : 10.2202/2152-2812.1064
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00704708

H. Einhorn and R. Hogarth, Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference., Psychological Review, vol.92, issue.4, pp.433-461, 1985.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.433

J. Fox, J. Shogren, D. Hayes, and J. Kliebenstein, CVM-X: Calibrating Contingent Values with Experimental Auction Markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.80, issue.3, pp.455-65, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/1244548

D. Fudenberg and D. Levine, The Theory of Learning in Games, 1998.

U. Gneezy, Updating the Reference Level: Experimental Evidence, Experimental Business Research, pp.263-284, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/0-387-24244-9_12

J. Goeree, C. Holt, and T. Palfrey, Quantal Response Equilibrium and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.104, issue.1, pp.247-272, 2002.
DOI : 10.1006/jeth.2001.2914

M. Hanemann, Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.8, issue.4, pp.19-43, 1994.
DOI : 10.1257/jep.8.4.19

S. Hart, Adaptive Heuristics, Econometrica, vol.73, issue.5, pp.1401-1430, 2005.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00625.x

D. Hausch, Multi-Object Auctions: Sequential vs. Simultaneous Sales, Management Science, vol.32, issue.12, pp.1599-1610, 1986.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.32.12.1599

D. Hayes, J. Shogren, S. Shin, and J. Kliebenstein, Valuing Food Safety in Experimental Auction Markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.77, issue.1, pp.40-53, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/1243887

J. Horowitz, What do we know about the performance of the Becker- DeGroot-Marschak mechanism?, 2006.

T. Jeitschko, Learning in Sequential Auctions, Southern Economic Journal, vol.65, issue.1, pp.98-112, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/1061354

J. Kagel, 9. Auctions A Survey of Experimental Research, Handbook of Experimental Economics, pp.501-585, 1995.
DOI : 10.1515/9781400883172-010

D. Kahneman, J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler, Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem, Journal of Political Economy, vol.98, issue.6, pp.1325-1348, 1990.
DOI : 10.1086/261737

P. Klemperer, Auction Theory: A Guide to the Literature, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol.13, issue.3, pp.227-286, 1999.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6419.00083

J. Knetsch, F. Tang, and R. Thaler, The Endowment Effect and Repeated Market Rounds: Is the Vickrey Auction Demand Revealing?, Experimental Economics, vol.4, issue.3, pp.257-69, 2001.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1013221421382

B. Koszegi and M. Rabin, A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.121, issue.4, pp.1133-1165, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/qje/121.4.1133

J. List and J. Shogren, Price Information and Bidding Behavior in Repeated Second-Price Auctions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.81, issue.4, pp.942-949, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/1244336

J. List, Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sportscards, American Economic Review, vol.91, issue.5, pp.1498-1507, 2001.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.91.5.1498

J. List, Using random nth-Price Auctions to value Non-Market Goods and Services, Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol.23, issue.2, pp.193-205, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1022259014448

J. Lusk, M. Daniel, D. Mark, and C. Lusk, Alternative Calibration and Auction Institutions for Predicting Consumer Willingness to Pay of Nongenetically Modified Corn Chips, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, vol.26, pp.40-57, 2001.

J. Lusk and M. Rousu, Market Price Endogeneity and Accuracy of Value Elicitation Mechanisms, Using Experimental Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, pp.21-40, 2006.
DOI : 10.4337/9781847203045.00007

J. Lusk and J. Shogren, Incentive compatible auctions: theory and evidence, Experimental Auctions, Methods and applications in Economic and Marketing Research, pp.19-27, 2007.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511611261.002

P. Milgrom and R. Weber, A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding, Econometrica, vol.50, issue.5, pp.1089-1122, 1982.
DOI : 10.2307/1911865

G. Morrison, WTP and WTA in repeated trial experiments: Learning or leading?, Journal of Economic Psychology, vol.21, issue.1, pp.57-72, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00036-7

J. Payne, J. Bettman, and E. Johnson, Adaptive strategy selection in decision making., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.14, issue.3, pp.534-552, 1988.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534

C. Plott, Rational individual behavior in markets and social choice processes: the Discovered Preference Hypothesis, Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, pp.225-250, 1996.

R. Saran and R. Serrano, The Evolution of Bidding Behavior in Private- Values Auctions and Double Auctions, IMDEA Working Paper Series in Economics and Social Sciences, 2007.

H. Shlomit, D. Monderer, and A. Sela, A Learning Approach to Auctions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.82, pp.65-88, 1998.

J. Shogren, S. Shin, D. Hayes, and J. Kliebenstein, Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept, American Economic Review, vol.84, pp.255-270, 1994.

J. Shogren and D. Hayes, Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: Reply, American Economic Review, vol.87, pp.241-244, 1997.

J. Shogren, M. Margolis, C. Koo, and J. List, A random nth-price auction, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.46, issue.4, pp.409-421, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00165-2

M. Spranca, E. Minsk, and J. Baron, Omission and commission in judgment and choice, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.27, issue.1, pp.76-105, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-T

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, vol.185, issue.4157, pp.1124-1130, 1974.
DOI : 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncrtainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.5, pp.292-323, 1992.

A. Tversky and P. Wakker, Risk Attitudes and Decision Weights, Econometrica, vol.63, issue.6, pp.1255-1280, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/2171769
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.558.904

G. Van-de-kuilen, Subjective Probability Weighting and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis, Theory and Decision, vol.42, issue.1, pp.1-22, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s11238-007-9080-0

J. Andreoni, Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving, The Economic Journal, vol.100, issue.401, pp.464-477, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/2234133

E. Auriol and R. Renault, Status and incentives, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.39, issue.1, pp.305-326, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00015.x

S. Ball and C. Eckel, The economic value of status, The Journal of Socio-Economics, vol.27, issue.4, pp.495-514, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S1053-5357(98)80004-8

S. Ball, C. Eckel, P. Grossman, and W. Zame, Status in Markets, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.116, issue.1, pp.161-188, 2001.
DOI : 10.1162/003355301556374

R. Bénabou and J. Tirole, Incentives and Prosocial Behavior, American Economic Review, vol.96, issue.5, pp.1652-1678, 2006.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.96.5.1652

T. Bergstrom, L. Blume, and H. Varian, On the private provision of public goods, Journal of Public Economics, vol.29, issue.1, pp.25-49, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0047-2727(86)90024-1

J. Bulow, J. Geanakoplos, and P. Klemperer, Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements, Journal of Political Economy, vol.93, issue.3, pp.488-511, 1985.
DOI : 10.1086/261312
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.541.2368

R. Frank, The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods, American Economic Review, vol.75, pp.101-116, 1985.

G. Goethals, Social Comparison Theory: Psychology from the Lost and Found, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.12, issue.3, pp.261-278, 1986.
DOI : 10.1177/0146167286123001

K. Hawkes, J. Altman, S. Beckerman, R. Grinker, H. Harpending et al., Why Hunter-Gatherers Work: An Ancient Version of the Problem of Public Goods [and Comments and Reply], Current Anthropology, vol.34, issue.4, pp.341-361, 1993.
DOI : 10.1086/204182

H. Holländer, A Social Exchange Approach to Voluntary Cooperation, American Economic Review, vol.80, pp.1157-1167, 1990.

M. Kolmar and A. Wagener, Contests and the Private Provision of Public Goods, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp.2008-2035, 2008.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1316277

M. Kotchen, Offsetting Green Guilt, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2009.

C. Kumru and L. Vesterlund, The Effect of Status on Voluntary Provision, Australian School of Business Research Paper, 2008.

F. Munoz-garcia, Competition for status acquisition in public good games, Oxford Economic Papers, vol.63, issue.3, 2008.
DOI : 10.1093/oep/gpr007

M. Olson, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, 1965.

J. Podolny, A Status-Based Model of Market Competition, American Journal of Sociology, vol.98, issue.4, pp.829-872, 1993.
DOI : 10.1086/230091

G. Roberts, Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.265, issue.1394, pp.427-431, 1998.
DOI : 10.1098/rspb.1998.0312

E. Smith, B. Bird, and R. , Turtle hunting and tombstone opening, Evolution and Human Behavior, vol.21, issue.4, pp.245-261, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00031-3

P. Warr, The private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income, Economics Letters, vol.13, issue.2-3, pp.207-211, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0165-1765(83)90087-3