N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, L. Cockmartin, S. Muller, I. Bloch et al., Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.59, issue.15, pp.4391-4409, 2014.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4391

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, S. Muller, I. Bloch, and H. Bosmans, Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.165, issue.1-4, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/rpd/ncv069

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017055

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, S. Muller, I. Bloch, and H. Bosmans, Breast characteristics and dosimetric data in X-ray mammography a large sample survey, Conference proceedings 1 International conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine (IAEA) Setting the scene for next decade CN-192, pp.3-7, 2012.

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, P. Giudici, L. Cockmartin, and H. Bosmans, Dual-energy CT characterization of X-ray attenuation properties of breast equivalent material plates. Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers, Medical Imaging, vol.8313, issue.02, pp.4-9, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00843365

E. Shaheen, F. Bemelmans, C. Van-ongeval, F. De-keyzer, N. Geeraert et al., The Investigation of Different Factors to Optimize the Simulation of 3D Mass Models in Breast Tomosynthesis, International Workshop on Breast Imaging proceedings, vol.7, pp.528-535, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_74

L. Vancamberg, N. Geeraert, R. Iordache, G. Palma, S. Muller et al., 3D density estimation in digital breast tomosynthesis: application to needle path planning for breast biopsy. Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers, Medical Imaging Fl Oral presentations 1 Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity, International conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine, pp.12-1705, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01050956

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, I. Bloch, S. Muller, and H. Bosmans, Accuracy of Breast Density Estimation from Mammographic Images, Belgian Hospital Physicist Association Annual, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00843356

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, M. Lemuhot, D. Sundermann, and S. Muller, Comparing consequences of rigid and flexible compression paddles on the Automatic Optimization of Parameters in mammography. European Medical Physicist and Engineering Conference, pp.1-3, 2011.

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, M. Lemuhot, D. Sundermann, S. Muller et al., Contribution of compression paddle flexibility to estimation of breast glandularity European Congress of Radiology. 3-7/03 Austria Poster presentations 1 Breast size and exposure control sensing area position: a large sample study, 2011.

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, L. Desponds, S. Muller, I. Bloch et al., Impact of breast glandular description on average glandular dose and radiation risk assessment in mammography, America Annual meeting. 1-7, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017098

A. L. Albright and J. S. Stern, Adipose tissue. Encyclopedia of Sports Medicine and Science, 1998.

O. Alonzo-proulx, N. Packard, J. M. Boone, A. Al-mayah, K. K. Brock et al., Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.55, issue.11, pp.3027-3044, 2010.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/55/11/003

A. H. Andersen and A. C. Kak, Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm, Ultrasonic Imaging, vol.12, issue.1, pp.81-94, 1984.
DOI : 10.1177/016173468400600107

S. Baatout, Private communication, 2012.

F. R. Bailey, W. M. Copenhaver, and D. D. Johnson, Bailey's Textbook of Histology, 1958.

P. R. Bakic, A. Carton, D. Kontos, C. Zhang, A. B. Troxel et al., Breast Percent Density: Estimation on Digital Mammograms and Central Tomosynthesis Projections, Radiology, vol.252, issue.1, pp.40-49, 2009.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2521081621

M. Becich, Pathology: why the future of medicine's gold standard is to go digital. Invited lecture at SPIE Medical Imaging, 2012.

J. R. Beckett and C. J. Kotre, Dosimetric implications of age related glandular changes in screening mammography, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.45, issue.3, pp.801-813, 2000.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/316

L. Beels, DNA double-strand breaks induced by low-dose exposure to X-rays used in medical diagnostics, 2011.

A. Beer, Bestimmung der Absorption des rothen Lichts in farbigen Fl??ssigkeiten, Annalen der Physik und Chemie, vol.162, issue.5, pp.78-88
DOI : 10.1002/andp.18521620505

A. Bleyer and H. G. Welch, Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol.367, 1998.

J. W. Boag, A. J. Stacey, and R. Davis, Radiation exposure to the patient in xeroradiography, The British Journal of Radiology, vol.49, issue.579, pp.253-261, 1976.
DOI : 10.1259/0007-1285-49-579-253

J. M. Boone, Glandular Breast Dose for Monoenergetic and High-Energy X-ray Beams: Monte Carlo Assessment, Radiology, vol.213, issue.1, pp.23-37, 1999.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923

J. M. Boone, Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary x-ray spectra in mammography: Computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data, Medical Physics, vol.38, issue.5, pp.869-875, 2002.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1472499

J. M. Boone, T. R. Nelson, K. K. Lindfors, and J. A. Seibert, Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation, Radiology, vol.221, issue.3, pp.657-667, 2001.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2213010334

P. Bouguer, Essai d'Optique, sur la gradation de lalumì ere, 1729.
DOI : 10.1259/jrs.1922.0026

URL : http://www.mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10080557-8

N. F. Boyd, L. J. Martin, M. J. Yaffe, and S. Minkin, Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects, Breast Cancer Research, vol.19, issue.12, pp.223-235, 2011.
DOI : 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1028

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326547

J. W. Byng, N. F. Boyd, E. Fishell, R. A. Jong, and M. J. Yaffe, The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.39, issue.10, pp.1629-1638, 1994.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/39/10/008

J. W. Byng, N. F. Boyd, E. Fishell, R. A. Jong, and M. J. Yaffe, Automated analysis of mammographic densities, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.41, issue.5, pp.909-923, 1996.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/41/5/007

J. Cameron, Dose equivalent out -imparted energy in, Health Physics Society (HPS) Newsletter, 1992.

A. K. Carton, A. Grisey, P. Milioni-de-carvalho, C. Dromain, and S. Muller, A Virtual Human Breast Phantom Using Surface Meshes and Geometric Internal Structures, Breast Imaging, vol.8539, pp.356-363, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_50

H. Chan and K. Doi, Radiation dose in diagnostic radiology: Monte Carlo simulation studies, Medical Physics, vol.11, issue.4, pp.480-490, 1984.
DOI : 10.1118/1.595541

J. Chen, D. Pee, R. Ayyagari, B. Graubard, C. Schairer et al., Projecting Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in White Women With a Model That Includes Mammographic Density, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.98, issue.17, pp.1215-1226, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djj332

C. Colin, C. Devic, A. Nol, M. Rabilloud, M. Zabot et al., DNA double-strand breaks induced by mammographic screening procedures in human mammary epithelial cells, International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol.258, issue.11, pp.1103-1112, 2011.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2421060171

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00640764

Y. S. Cordoliani, La dose efficace individuelle moyenne n???existe pas??? et pourtant elle augmente??!, Journal de Radiologie, vol.91, issue.4, pp.449-450, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S0221-0363(10)70059-7

K. Cranley, B. J. Gilmore, G. W. Fogarty, and L. Desponds, Ipem-report 78: Catalogue of diagnostic X-ray spectra and other data, medicine (IPEM), 1997.

D. Dance and K. C. Young, Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.59, issue.9, pp.2127-2137, 2014.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/59/9/2127

D. R. Dance, The Monte Carlo calculation of integral radiation dose in xeromammography, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.25, issue.1, pp.25-37, 1980.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/25/1/003

D. R. Dance, Monte-Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.35, issue.9, pp.1211-1219, 1990.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/002

D. R. Dance, R. A. Hunt, P. R. Bakic, A. D. Maidment, M. Sandborg et al., Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms. Radiation protection dosimetry, pp.359-363, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/rpd/nch510

URL : http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/114/1-3/359

D. R. Dance, C. L. Skinner, K. C. Young, J. R. Beckett, and C. J. Kotre, Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.45, issue.11, pp.3225-3240, 2000.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308

D. R. Dance, D. L. Skinner, and G. A. Carlsson, Breast dosimetry, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol.50, issue.1, pp.185-203, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00047-5

D. R. Dance, K. C. Young, and R. E. Van-engen, Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.54, issue.14, pp.4361-4372, 2009.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/002

D. R. Dance, K. C. Young, and R. E. Van-engen, Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.56, issue.2, pp.453-471, 2011.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/56/2/011

P. Milioni-de-carvalho, Low-Dose 3D Quantitative Vascular X-ray Imaging of the Breast, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01292379

S. F. Dehkordy, R. C. Carlos, K. S. Hall, and V. K. Dalton, Novel data sources for women's health research: Mapping breast screening online information seeking through google trends, Academic Radiology, 2014.

R. D. Deslattes, Estimates of X-ray attenuation coefficients for the elements and their compounds, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography, vol.25, issue.1, pp.89-93, 1969.
DOI : 10.1107/S0567739469000118

L. Desponds and R. Klausz, Automatic estimation of breast composition with mammographic X-ray systems, RSNA) - Annual meeting, 1994.

B. Dirat, L. Bochet, M. Dabek, D. Daviaud, S. Dauvillier et al., Cancer-Associated Adipocytes Exhibit an Activated Phenotype and Contribute to Breast Cancer Invasion, Cancer Research, vol.71, issue.7, pp.2455-2465, 2011.
DOI : 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3323

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00819288

M. Durnez, Comparison of density estimates from (3D) chest CT and 2D mammography, 2011.

P. P. Fatouros, S. E. Skubic, and H. Goodman, The development and use of realistically shaped, tissue-equivalent phantoms for assessing the mammographic process, Radiology, vol.157, p.32, 1985.

N. Foray and C. Colin, Relationship between radiosensitivity, initial DNA damage, apoptosis and gene expression: Between reproducible works and technical artefacts, The Breast, vol.22, issue.2, p.185, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.008

N. Foray, C. Colin, and M. Bourguignon, 100 Years of Individual Radiosensitivity: How We Have Forgotten the Evidence, Radiology, vol.264, issue.3, 2012.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.12112560

E. E. Fowler, T. A. Sellers, B. Lu, and J. J. Heine, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: Automated measurement development for full field digital mammography, Medical Physics, vol.36, issue.11, p.113502, 2013.
DOI : 10.1118/1.3250863

M. H. Gail, W. F. Anderson, M. Garcia-closas, and M. E. Sherman, Absolute Risk Models for Subtypes of Breast Cancer, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.99, issue.22, pp.1657-1659, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djm228

B. Galerne, Y. Gousseau, and J. M. , Random Phase Textures: Theory and Synthesis, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.20, issue.1, pp.257-267, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2010.2052822

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00418389

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, L. Cockmartin, S. Muller, H. Bosmans et al., Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.59, issue.15, pp.4391-4409, 2014.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4391

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, L. Desponds, S. Muller, I. Bloch et al., Impact of breast glandular description on average glandular dose and radiation risk assessment in mammography, RSNA) -Annual meeting, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017098

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, P. Giudici, L. Cockmartin, and H. Bosmans, Dual energy CT-based characterization of x-ray attenuation properties of breast equivalent material plates, Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging, 2012.
DOI : 10.1117/12.911334

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00843365

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, S. Muller, I. Bloch, and H. Bosmans, Breast characteristics and dosimetric data in X-ray mammography -a large sample survey, International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine -Setting the Scene for the Next Decade, pp.192-207, 2012.

N. Geeraert, R. Klausz, S. Muller, I. Bloch, and H. Bosmans, Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.165, issue.1-4, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/rpd/ncv069

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017055

N. A. Gkanatios and W. Huda, Computation of energy imparted in diagnostic radiology, Medical Physics, vol.51, issue.4, pp.571-579, 1997.
DOI : 10.1118/1.597939

G. Van-gompel, N. Buls, K. Nieboer, and J. De-mey, Accuracy estimation of spectral attenuation curves obtained by Dual Energy CT, European Conference on Radiology -Annual meeting, 2011.

I. T. Gram, E. Funkhouser, and L. Tabar, The Tab??r classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns, European Journal of Radiology, vol.24, issue.2, pp.131-136, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0720-048X(96)01138-2

B. Grosjean, Lesion Detectability in Digital Mammography: Impact of Texture, 2007.

G. R. Hammerstein, D. W. Miller, D. R. White, M. E. Masterson, H. Q. Woodard et al., Absorbed Radiation Dose in Mammography, Radiology, vol.130, issue.2, pp.485-491, 1979.
DOI : 10.1148/130.2.485

E. Haneda, E. Tkaczyk, G. Palma, R. Iordache, S. Zelakiewicz et al., Towards a dose reduction strategy using model-based reconstruction with limited-angle tomosynthesis, In SPIE Medical Imaging Physics of Medical Imaging, vol.9033, 2014.

B. L. Hart, R. T. Steinbock, F. A. Mettler-jr, D. R. Pathak, and S. A. Bartow, Age and race related changes in mammographic parenchymal patterns, Cancer, vol.121, issue.12, pp.2537-2539, 1989.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(19890615)63:12<2537::AID-CNCR2820631230>3.0.CO;2-0

K. Hartman, R. Highnam, R. Warren, and V. Jackson, Volumetric Assessment of Breast Tissue Composition from FFDM Images, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.33-39, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_5

I. H. Hauge, P. Hogg, K. Szczepura, P. Connolly, G. Mcgill et al., The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units, Medical Physics, vol.36, issue.1, pp.263-271, 2012.
DOI : 10.1118/1.3065066

R. Heidsieck, FR 2648229 (A1) -Procédé d'´ etalonnage d'un système radiologique et de mesure de l'´ epaisseuréquivalenteepaisseuréquivalente d'un objet, 1989.

J. J. Heine, E. E. Fowler, and C. I. Flowers, Full Field Digital Mammography and Breast Density, Academic Radiology, vol.18, issue.11, pp.1430-1436, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.acra.2011.07.011

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3190123

R. Highnam, M. Brady, and B. Shepstone, A representation for mammographic image processing, Medical Image Analysis, vol.1, issue.1, pp.1-18, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)80002-5

R. Highnam, S. M. Brady, M. J. Yaffe, N. Karssemeijer, and J. Harvey, Robust breast composition measurement -Volpara, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, p.342, 2010.

R. Highnam, X. Pan, R. Warren, M. Jeffreys, G. D. Smith et al., Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF), Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.51, issue.11, pp.2695-2713, 2006.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/51/11/001

S. Y. Huang, J. M. Boone, K. Yang, A. L. Kwan, and N. J. Packard, The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry, Medical Physics, vol.288, issue.4, pp.1199-1206, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S0009-9260(82)80407-8

W. Huda, J. Mclellan, and Y. Mclellan, How will the new definition of 'effective dose' modify estimates of dose in diagnostic radiology?, Journal of Radiological Protection, vol.11, issue.4, pp.241-247, 1991.
DOI : 10.1088/0952-4746/11/4/003

Z. Huo, M. L. Giger, D. E. Wolverton, W. Zhong, S. Cumming et al., Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: Feature selection, Medical Physics, vol.41, issue.1, pp.4-12, 2000.
DOI : 10.1118/1.598851

R. W. Jakes, S. W. Duffy, F. C. Ng, F. Gao, and E. H. Ng, Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer at and after a prevalence screen in Singaporean women, International Journal of Epidemiology, vol.29, issue.1, pp.11-19, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/ije/29.1.11

M. Jeffreys, R. Warren, R. Highnam, and G. D. Smith, Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study, British Journal of Cancer, vol.8, issue.1, pp.210-216, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.013

P. C. Johns and M. J. Yaffe, X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.32, issue.6, pp.675-695, 1986.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/32/6/002

M. Karlsson, K. Nygren, G. Wickman, and G. Hettinger, Absorbed Dose Tn Mammary Radiography, Acta Radiologica: Therapy, Physics, Biology, vol.116, issue.3, pp.252-258, 1976.
DOI : 10.3109/02841867609131962

J. Kaufhold, J. A. Thomas, and J. W. Eberhard, Longitudinal retrospective study of breast tissue composition, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.486-490, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-59327-7_114

J. Kaufhold, J. A. Thomas, J. W. Eberhard, C. E. Galbo, and D. E. Trotter, A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography, Medical Physics, vol.26, issue.8, pp.1867-1880, 2002.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1493215

B. M. Keller, J. Chen, E. Conant, and D. Kontos, Breast density and parenchymal texture measures as potential risk factors for estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer, In SPIE Medical Imaging Medical Imaging, vol.9035, 2013.

B. M. Keller, E. F. Conant, H. Oh, and D. Kontos, Breast Cancer Risk Prediction via Area and Volumetric Estimates of Breast Density, Breast Imaging, vol.11, pp.236-243, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_31

C. Kerrison, O. Putt, J. C. Sergeant, T. Dunn, J. Diffey et al., Breast Density Measurement in Full-Field Digital Mammography: System Calibration and Stability, Breast Imaging, p.545, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_70

R. Klausz, FR 2939200 (B1) -Procédé et dispositif d'acquisition d'images médicales, 2013.

R. Klausz and N. Shramchenko, Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography. Radiation protection dosimetry, pp.369-74, 2005.

R. Klein, H. Aichinger, J. Dierker, J. T. Jansen, S. Joite-barfu et al., Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.42, issue.4, pp.651-671, 1997.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/42/4/004

D. Kopans, Arguments Against Mammography Screening Continue to be Based on Faulty Science, The Oncologist, vol.19, issue.2, pp.107-112, 2014.
DOI : 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0184

D. B. Kopans, Basic Physics and Doubts about Relationship between Mammographically Determined Tissue Density and Breast Cancer Risk, Radiology, vol.246, issue.2, pp.348-353, 2008.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2461070309

P. Kovesi, Image Features from Phase Congruency. Videre, 1999.

J. H. Lambert, Photometria sive de mensura et gradibus luminis, colorum et umbrae, 1760.

R. J. Last, Anatomy: regional and applied, 1984.

J. Li, K. Humphreys, L. Eriksson, G. Edgren, K. Czene et al., Mammographic Density Reduction Is a Prognostic Marker of Response to Adjuvant Tamoxifen Therapy in Postmenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.31, issue.18, pp.1-10, 2013.
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.5015

X. Z. Li, S. Williams, and M. J. Bottema, Texture and region dependent breast cancer risk assessment from screening mammograms, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol.36, pp.117-124, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.10.001

M. P. Lisanti, A. Tsirigos, S. Pavlides, K. J. Reeves, M. Peiris-pags et al., JNK1 stress signaling is hyper-activated in high breast density and the tumor stroma: Connecting fibrosis, inflammation, and stemness for cancer prevention, Cell Cycle, vol.28, issue.4, pp.580-599, 2014.
DOI : 10.4161/cc.27379

L. W. Lu, T. K. Nishino, T. Khamapirad, J. J. Grady, M. H. Leonard-jr et al., Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.52, issue.16, pp.4905-4921, 2007.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/52/16/013

S. Malkov, J. Wang, and J. Shepherd, Improvements to Single Energy Absorptiometry Method for Digital Mammography to Quantify Breast Tissue Density, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.1-8, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_1

B. De-man, S. Basu, N. Chandra, B. Dunham, P. Edic et al., CatSim: a new computer assisted tomography simulation environment, Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging, pp.1-8, 2007.
DOI : 10.1117/12.710713

N. W. Marshall and H. Bosmans, Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.57, issue.22, pp.7629-7650, 2012.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/57/22/7629

L. J. Martin and N. F. Boyd, Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence, Breast Cancer Research, vol.10, issue.1, pp.201-214, 2008.
DOI : 10.1186/bcr1831

G. E. Mawdsley, A. H. Tyson, C. L. Peressotti, R. A. Jong, and M. J. Yaffe, Accurate estimation of compressed breast thickness in mammography, Medical Physics, vol.36, issue.2, pp.577-586, 2009.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1539038

V. A. Mccormack, I. , and S. Silva, Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol.15, issue.6, pp.1159-1169, 2006.
DOI : 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034

T. Mertelmeier, J. Orman, W. Haerer, and M. K. Dudam, Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device, Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of Medical Imaging, p.0, 2006.
DOI : 10.1117/12.651380

N. Metropolis and S. Ulam, The Monte Carlo Method, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.44, issue.247, pp.335-341, 1949.
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310

A. B. Miller, C. Wall, C. Baines, P. Sun, T. To et al., Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial, BMJ, vol.348, issue.feb11 9, p.366, 2014.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.g366

D. L. Page and A. C. Winfield, The dense mammogram, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.147, issue.3, pp.487-489, 1986.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.147.3.487

V. Patel, R. Highnam, C. Tromans, R. J. Pizzutiello, and S. Destounis, Patient specific average glandular dose in mammogrpaphy. In The international journal of medical physics research and practice, p.96, 2013.

O. Pawluczyk, B. J. Augustine, M. J. Yaffe, D. Rico, J. Yang et al., A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms, Medical Physics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.352-364, 2003.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1539038

N. Perry, M. Broeders, C. De-wolf, S. Törnberg, R. Holland et al., European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2006.

M. E. Poletti, O. D. Goncalves, and I. Mazzaro, X-ray scattering from human breast tissues and breast-equivalent materials, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.47, issue.1, pp.47-63, 2002.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/47/1/304

S. T. Polhmann, J. Hewes, A. I. Williamson, J. C. Sergeant, A. Hufton et al., Breast volume measurements using a games console input device, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.666-673, 2014.

M. Porras-chaverri, J. Vetter, and R. Highnam, WE-G-103-08: Retrospective Determination of Personalized Mean Glandular Dose Coefficients for Conventional Mammography Using Heterogeneously-Layered Breast Models, Medical Physics, vol.40, issue.6, p.511, 2013.
DOI : 10.1118/1.4815668

M. A. Porras-chaverri, J. R. Vetter, and R. Highnam, Personalizing mammographyic dosimetry using multilayered anatomy-based breast models, Breast Imaging, pp.134-140, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_18

X. Qin, G. Lu, I. Sechopoulos, and B. Fei, Breast tissue classification in digital breast tomosynthesis images based on global gradient minimization and texture features, SPIE Medical Imaging, volume 9034 of Classification and texture, 2014.

I. Reiser, S. Lee, and R. M. Nishikawa, On the orientation of mammographic structure, Medical Physics, vol.35, issue.14, pp.5303-5306, 2011.
DOI : 10.1118/1.2977772

B. Ren, A. Smith, and Z. Jing, Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis, Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging, p.173, 2012.
DOI : 10.1117/12.913357

M. Rosenstein, HANDBOOK of Selected Tissue Doses for Projections Common In Diagnostic Radiology. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 1988.

M. Salvatore, L. Margolies, M. Kale, J. Wisnivesky, S. Kotkin et al., Breast Density: Comparison of Chest CT with Mammography, Radiology, vol.270, issue.1, pp.67-73, 2014.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13130733

E. Samei, X. Li, B. Chen, and R. Reiman, The effect of dose heterogeneity on radiation risk in medical imaging, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.155, issue.1, pp.42-58, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/rpd/ncs275

I. Sechopoulos, E. S. Ali, A. Badal, A. Badano, J. M. Boone et al., Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research. Task group 195, 2014.

I. Sechopoulos, K. Bliznakova, X. Qin, B. Fei, and S. S. Feng, Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry, Medical Physics, vol.49, issue.8, pp.5050-5059, 2012.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/49/24/003

J. C. Sergeant, J. Warwick, D. G. Evans, A. Howell, M. Berks et al., Volumetric and Area-Based Breast Density Measurement in the Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening (PROCAS) Study, Breast Imaging, pp.228-235, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_30

J. A. Shepherd, L. Herve, J. Landau, B. Fan, K. Kerlikowske et al., Novel use of Single X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Breast Density, Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, vol.41, issue.2, pp.173-182, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01774016

N. Shramchenko, P. Blin, C. Mathey, and R. Klausz, Optimized exposure control in digital mammography, Medical Imaging 2004: Physics of Medical Imaging, 2004.
DOI : 10.1117/12.535463

S. E. Skubic and P. P. Fatouros, The effect of breast composition on absorbed dose and image contrast, Medical Physics, vol.16, issue.4, pp.544-542, 1989.
DOI : 10.1118/1.596356

W. T. Sobol and X. Wu, Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables, Medical Physics, vol.193, issue.4, pp.547-554, 1997.
DOI : 10.1118/1.597937

L. Tabar and T. H. Chen, We do not want to go back to the dark ages of breast screening, 2014.

L. Tabar and P. B. Dean, Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns, JAMA, vol.247, issue.2, pp.185-189, 1982.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1982.03320270023016

L. Tabar and P. B. Dean, Teaching atlas of mammography. Thieme, 2001.

A. Tagliafico, G. Tagliafico, D. Astengo, F. Cavagnetto, R. Rosasco et al., Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software, European Radiology, vol.20, issue.6, pp.1265-1270, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-012-2380-y

A. Tagliafico, G. Tagliafico, and N. Houssami, Differences in breast density assessment using mammography, tomosynthesis and MRI and their implications for practice, The British Journal of Radiology, vol.86, issue.1032, p.20130528, 2013.
DOI : 10.1259/bjr.20130528

C. Ting, S. M. Astley, J. Morris, P. Stavrinos, M. Wilson et al., Longitudinal Change in Mammographic Density and Association with Breast Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study, Breast Imaging, pp.205-211, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_27

C. Tromans, A. Chan, and R. Highnam, Comparing personalized mean glandular dose estimates between X-ray systems over time in mammography, European Congress on Radiology, p.360, 2014.

A. H. Tyson, G. E. Mawdsley, and M. J. Yaffe, Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetry, Medical Physics, vol.5, issue.5, pp.569-576, 2009.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1668512

S. Van-engeland, P. R. Snoeren, H. Huisman, C. Boetes, and N. Karssemeijer, Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.25, issue.3, pp.273-282, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/TMI.2005.862741

C. H. Van-gils, J. H. Hendriks, R. Holland, N. Karssemeijer, J. D. Otten et al., Changes in mammographic breast density and concomitant changes in breast cancer risk, European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol.8, issue.6, pp.509-515, 1999.
DOI : 10.1097/00008469-199912000-00006

L. Vancamberg, N. Geeraert, R. Iordache, G. Palma, R. Klausz et al., 3D density estimation in digital breast tomosynthesis: application to needle path planning for breast biopsy, Medical Imaging 2011: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling, 2011.
DOI : 10.1117/12.878169

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01050956

S. Vedantham, L. Shi, A. Karellas, and A. M. , Dedicated breast CT: Fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population, Medical Physics, vol.213, issue.1, pp.7317-7328, 2012.
DOI : 10.1118/1.3688197

J. Wang, A. Azziz, B. Fan, S. Malkov, C. Klifa et al., Agreement of Mammographic Measures of Volumetric Breast Density to MRI, PLoS ONE, vol.57, issue.12, p.81653, 2013.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0081653.t003

Y. Wang, B. M. Keller, Y. Zheng, R. J. Acciavatti, J. C. Gee et al., Texture feature standardization in digital mammography for improving generalizability across devices, Medical Imaging 2013: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 2013.
DOI : 10.1117/12.2008149

S. Webb, From the Watching of Shadows, Journal of Clinical Engineering, vol.16, issue.3, p.11, 1948.
DOI : 10.1097/00004669-199105000-00016

D. R. White, R. J. Martin, and R. Darlison, Epoxy resin based tissue substitutes, The British Journal of Radiology, vol.50, issue.599, pp.814-821, 1977.
DOI : 10.1259/0007-1285-50-599-814

E. White, P. Velentgas, M. T. Mandelson, C. D. Lehman, J. G. Elmore et al., Variation in Mammographic Breast Density by Time in Menstrual Cycle Among Women Aged 40-49 Years, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.90, issue.12, pp.906-910, 1998.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/90.12.906

N. J. Wolfe, Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.126, issue.6, pp.1130-1139, 1976.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130

X. Wu, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography., Radiology, vol.179, issue.1, pp.143-148, 1991.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006265

X. Wu, E. L. Gingold, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography., Radiology, vol.193, issue.1, pp.83-89, 1994.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090926

X. Wu, D. A. Langan, D. Xu, T. M. Benson, J. D. Pack et al., Monochromatic CT image representation via fast switching dual kVp, Medical Imaging 2009: Physics of Medical Imaging, 2009.
DOI : 10.1117/12.811698

M. J. Yaffe, J. M. Boone, N. Packard, O. Alonzo-proulx, S. Huang et al., The myth of the 50-50 breast, Medical Physics, vol.80, issue.6, pp.5437-5443, 2009.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308

K. C. Young and A. Burch, Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998., The British Journal of Radiology, vol.73, issue.867, pp.278-287, 2000.
DOI : 10.1259/bjr.73.867.10817044

K. C. Young, M. L. Ramsdale, and F. Bignell, Review of Dosimetric Methods for Mammography in the UK Breast Screening Programme, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.80, issue.1, pp.186-187, 1998.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032501

D. Zhang, X. Li, and B. Liua, Objective characterization of GE Discovery CT750 HD scanner: Gemstone spectral imaging mode, Medical Physics, vol.3, issue.3, pp.1178-1188, 2011.
DOI : 10.1097/00004728-197902000-00013

C. Zhou, H. Chan, N. Petrick, M. A. Helvie, M. M. Goodsitt et al., Computerized image analysis: Estimation of breast density on mammograms, Medical Physics, vol.17, issue.6, pp.1056-1069, 2001.
DOI : 10.1118/1.1376640