Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.59, issue.15, pp.4391-4409, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4391
Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.165, issue.1-4, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1093/rpd/ncv069
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017055
Breast characteristics and dosimetric data in X-ray mammography a large sample survey, Conference proceedings 1 International conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine (IAEA) Setting the scene for next decade CN-192, pp.3-7, 2012. ,
Dual-energy CT characterization of X-ray attenuation properties of breast equivalent material plates. Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers, Medical Imaging, vol.8313, issue.02, pp.4-9, 2012. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00843365
The Investigation of Different Factors to Optimize the Simulation of 3D Mass Models in Breast Tomosynthesis, International Workshop on Breast Imaging proceedings, vol.7, pp.528-535, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_74
3D density estimation in digital breast tomosynthesis: application to needle path planning for breast biopsy. Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers, Medical Imaging Fl Oral presentations 1 Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity, International conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine, pp.12-1705, 2011. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01050956
Accuracy of Breast Density Estimation from Mammographic Images, Belgian Hospital Physicist Association Annual, 2013. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00843356
Comparing consequences of rigid and flexible compression paddles on the Automatic Optimization of Parameters in mammography. European Medical Physicist and Engineering Conference, pp.1-3, 2011. ,
Contribution of compression paddle flexibility to estimation of breast glandularity European Congress of Radiology. 3-7/03 Austria Poster presentations 1 Breast size and exposure control sensing area position: a large sample study, 2011. ,
Impact of breast glandular description on average glandular dose and radiation risk assessment in mammography, America Annual meeting. 1-7, 2012. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017098
Adipose tissue. Encyclopedia of Sports Medicine and Science, 1998. ,
Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.55, issue.11, pp.3027-3044, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/55/11/003
Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm, Ultrasonic Imaging, vol.12, issue.1, pp.81-94, 1984. ,
DOI : 10.1177/016173468400600107
Private communication, 2012. ,
Bailey's Textbook of Histology, 1958. ,
Breast Percent Density: Estimation on Digital Mammograms and Central Tomosynthesis Projections, Radiology, vol.252, issue.1, pp.40-49, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2521081621
Pathology: why the future of medicine's gold standard is to go digital. Invited lecture at SPIE Medical Imaging, 2012. ,
Dosimetric implications of age related glandular changes in screening mammography, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.45, issue.3, pp.801-813, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/316
DNA double-strand breaks induced by low-dose exposure to X-rays used in medical diagnostics, 2011. ,
Bestimmung der Absorption des rothen Lichts in farbigen Fl??ssigkeiten, Annalen der Physik und Chemie, vol.162, issue.5, pp.78-88 ,
DOI : 10.1002/andp.18521620505
Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol.367, 1998. ,
Radiation exposure to the patient in xeroradiography, The British Journal of Radiology, vol.49, issue.579, pp.253-261, 1976. ,
DOI : 10.1259/0007-1285-49-579-253
Glandular Breast Dose for Monoenergetic and High-Energy X-ray Beams: Monte Carlo Assessment, Radiology, vol.213, issue.1, pp.23-37, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923
Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary x-ray spectra in mammography: Computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data, Medical Physics, vol.38, issue.5, pp.869-875, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.1472499
Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation, Radiology, vol.221, issue.3, pp.657-667, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2213010334
Essai d'Optique, sur la gradation de lalumì ere, 1729. ,
DOI : 10.1259/jrs.1922.0026
URL : http://www.mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10080557-8
Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects, Breast Cancer Research, vol.19, issue.12, pp.223-235, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1028
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326547
The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.39, issue.10, pp.1629-1638, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/39/10/008
Automated analysis of mammographic densities, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.41, issue.5, pp.909-923, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/41/5/007
Dose equivalent out -imparted energy in, Health Physics Society (HPS) Newsletter, 1992. ,
A Virtual Human Breast Phantom Using Surface Meshes and Geometric Internal Structures, Breast Imaging, vol.8539, pp.356-363, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_50
Radiation dose in diagnostic radiology: Monte Carlo simulation studies, Medical Physics, vol.11, issue.4, pp.480-490, 1984. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.595541
Projecting Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in White Women With a Model That Includes Mammographic Density, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.98, issue.17, pp.1215-1226, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djj332
DNA double-strand breaks induced by mammographic screening procedures in human mammary epithelial cells, International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol.258, issue.11, pp.1103-1112, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2421060171
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00640764
La dose efficace individuelle moyenne n???existe pas??? et pourtant elle augmente??!, Journal de Radiologie, vol.91, issue.4, pp.449-450, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0221-0363(10)70059-7
Ipem-report 78: Catalogue of diagnostic X-ray spectra and other data, medicine (IPEM), 1997. ,
Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.59, issue.9, pp.2127-2137, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/59/9/2127
The Monte Carlo calculation of integral radiation dose in xeromammography, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.25, issue.1, pp.25-37, 1980. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/25/1/003
Monte-Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.35, issue.9, pp.1211-1219, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/002
Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms. Radiation protection dosimetry, pp.359-363, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1093/rpd/nch510
URL : http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/114/1-3/359
Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.45, issue.11, pp.3225-3240, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308
Breast dosimetry, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol.50, issue.1, pp.185-203, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00047-5
Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.54, issue.14, pp.4361-4372, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/002
Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.56, issue.2, pp.453-471, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/56/2/011
Low-Dose 3D Quantitative Vascular X-ray Imaging of the Breast, 2014. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01292379
Novel data sources for women's health research: Mapping breast screening online information seeking through google trends, Academic Radiology, 2014. ,
Estimates of X-ray attenuation coefficients for the elements and their compounds, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography, vol.25, issue.1, pp.89-93, 1969. ,
DOI : 10.1107/S0567739469000118
Automatic estimation of breast composition with mammographic X-ray systems, RSNA) - Annual meeting, 1994. ,
Cancer-Associated Adipocytes Exhibit an Activated Phenotype and Contribute to Breast Cancer Invasion, Cancer Research, vol.71, issue.7, pp.2455-2465, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3323
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00819288
Comparison of density estimates from (3D) chest CT and 2D mammography, 2011. ,
The development and use of realistically shaped, tissue-equivalent phantoms for assessing the mammographic process, Radiology, vol.157, p.32, 1985. ,
Relationship between radiosensitivity, initial DNA damage, apoptosis and gene expression: Between reproducible works and technical artefacts, The Breast, vol.22, issue.2, p.185, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.008
100 Years of Individual Radiosensitivity: How We Have Forgotten the Evidence, Radiology, vol.264, issue.3, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.12112560
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: Automated measurement development for full field digital mammography, Medical Physics, vol.36, issue.11, p.113502, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.3250863
Absolute Risk Models for Subtypes of Breast Cancer, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.99, issue.22, pp.1657-1659, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djm228
Random Phase Textures: Theory and Synthesis, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.20, issue.1, pp.257-267, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2010.2052822
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00418389
Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.59, issue.15, pp.4391-4409, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4391
Impact of breast glandular description on average glandular dose and radiation risk assessment in mammography, RSNA) -Annual meeting, 2013. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017098
Dual energy CT-based characterization of x-ray attenuation properties of breast equivalent material plates, Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.911334
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00843365
Breast characteristics and dosimetric data in X-ray mammography -a large sample survey, International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine -Setting the Scene for the Next Decade, pp.192-207, 2012. ,
Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.165, issue.1-4, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1093/rpd/ncv069
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017055
Computation of energy imparted in diagnostic radiology, Medical Physics, vol.51, issue.4, pp.571-579, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.597939
Accuracy estimation of spectral attenuation curves obtained by Dual Energy CT, European Conference on Radiology -Annual meeting, 2011. ,
The Tab??r classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns, European Journal of Radiology, vol.24, issue.2, pp.131-136, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0720-048X(96)01138-2
Lesion Detectability in Digital Mammography: Impact of Texture, 2007. ,
Absorbed Radiation Dose in Mammography, Radiology, vol.130, issue.2, pp.485-491, 1979. ,
DOI : 10.1148/130.2.485
Towards a dose reduction strategy using model-based reconstruction with limited-angle tomosynthesis, In SPIE Medical Imaging Physics of Medical Imaging, vol.9033, 2014. ,
Age and race related changes in mammographic parenchymal patterns, Cancer, vol.121, issue.12, pp.2537-2539, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(19890615)63:12<2537::AID-CNCR2820631230>3.0.CO;2-0
Volumetric Assessment of Breast Tissue Composition from FFDM Images, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.33-39, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_5
The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units, Medical Physics, vol.36, issue.1, pp.263-271, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.3065066
FR 2648229 (A1) -Procédé d'´ etalonnage d'un système radiologique et de mesure de l'´ epaisseuréquivalenteepaisseuréquivalente d'un objet, 1989. ,
Full Field Digital Mammography and Breast Density, Academic Radiology, vol.18, issue.11, pp.1430-1436, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.acra.2011.07.011
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3190123
A representation for mammographic image processing, Medical Image Analysis, vol.1, issue.1, pp.1-18, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)80002-5
Robust breast composition measurement -Volpara, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, p.342, 2010. ,
Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF), Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.51, issue.11, pp.2695-2713, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/51/11/001
The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry, Medical Physics, vol.288, issue.4, pp.1199-1206, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0009-9260(82)80407-8
How will the new definition of 'effective dose' modify estimates of dose in diagnostic radiology?, Journal of Radiological Protection, vol.11, issue.4, pp.241-247, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0952-4746/11/4/003
Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: Feature selection, Medical Physics, vol.41, issue.1, pp.4-12, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.598851
Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer at and after a prevalence screen in Singaporean women, International Journal of Epidemiology, vol.29, issue.1, pp.11-19, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ije/29.1.11
Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study, British Journal of Cancer, vol.8, issue.1, pp.210-216, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.013
X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.32, issue.6, pp.675-695, 1986. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/32/6/002
Absorbed Dose Tn Mammary Radiography, Acta Radiologica: Therapy, Physics, Biology, vol.116, issue.3, pp.252-258, 1976. ,
DOI : 10.3109/02841867609131962
Longitudinal retrospective study of breast tissue composition, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.486-490, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-59327-7_114
A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography, Medical Physics, vol.26, issue.8, pp.1867-1880, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.1493215
Breast density and parenchymal texture measures as potential risk factors for estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer, In SPIE Medical Imaging Medical Imaging, vol.9035, 2013. ,
Breast Cancer Risk Prediction via Area and Volumetric Estimates of Breast Density, Breast Imaging, vol.11, pp.236-243, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_31
Breast Density Measurement in Full-Field Digital Mammography: System Calibration and Stability, Breast Imaging, p.545, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_70
FR 2939200 (B1) -Procédé et dispositif d'acquisition d'images médicales, 2013. ,
Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography. Radiation protection dosimetry, pp.369-74, 2005. ,
Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.42, issue.4, pp.651-671, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/42/4/004
Arguments Against Mammography Screening Continue to be Based on Faulty Science, The Oncologist, vol.19, issue.2, pp.107-112, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0184
Basic Physics and Doubts about Relationship between Mammographically Determined Tissue Density and Breast Cancer Risk, Radiology, vol.246, issue.2, pp.348-353, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2461070309
Image Features from Phase Congruency. Videre, 1999. ,
Photometria sive de mensura et gradibus luminis, colorum et umbrae, 1760. ,
Anatomy: regional and applied, 1984. ,
Mammographic Density Reduction Is a Prognostic Marker of Response to Adjuvant Tamoxifen Therapy in Postmenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.31, issue.18, pp.1-10, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.5015
Texture and region dependent breast cancer risk assessment from screening mammograms, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol.36, pp.117-124, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.10.001
JNK1 stress signaling is hyper-activated in high breast density and the tumor stroma: Connecting fibrosis, inflammation, and stemness for cancer prevention, Cell Cycle, vol.28, issue.4, pp.580-599, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.4161/cc.27379
Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.52, issue.16, pp.4905-4921, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/52/16/013
Improvements to Single Energy Absorptiometry Method for Digital Mammography to Quantify Breast Tissue Density, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.1-8, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_1
CatSim: a new computer assisted tomography simulation environment, Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging, pp.1-8, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.710713
Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.57, issue.22, pp.7629-7650, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/57/22/7629
Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence, Breast Cancer Research, vol.10, issue.1, pp.201-214, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1186/bcr1831
Accurate estimation of compressed breast thickness in mammography, Medical Physics, vol.36, issue.2, pp.577-586, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.1539038
Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol.15, issue.6, pp.1159-1169, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034
Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device, Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of Medical Imaging, p.0, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.651380
The Monte Carlo Method, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.44, issue.247, pp.335-341, 1949. ,
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310
Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial, BMJ, vol.348, issue.feb11 9, p.366, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.g366
The dense mammogram, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.147, issue.3, pp.487-489, 1986. ,
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.147.3.487
Patient specific average glandular dose in mammogrpaphy. In The international journal of medical physics research and practice, p.96, 2013. ,
A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms, Medical Physics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.352-364, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.1539038
European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2006. ,
X-ray scattering from human breast tissues and breast-equivalent materials, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.47, issue.1, pp.47-63, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/47/1/304
Breast volume measurements using a games console input device, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp.666-673, 2014. ,
WE-G-103-08: Retrospective Determination of Personalized Mean Glandular Dose Coefficients for Conventional Mammography Using Heterogeneously-Layered Breast Models, Medical Physics, vol.40, issue.6, p.511, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.4815668
Personalizing mammographyic dosimetry using multilayered anatomy-based breast models, Breast Imaging, pp.134-140, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_18
Breast tissue classification in digital breast tomosynthesis images based on global gradient minimization and texture features, SPIE Medical Imaging, volume 9034 of Classification and texture, 2014. ,
On the orientation of mammographic structure, Medical Physics, vol.35, issue.14, pp.5303-5306, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.2977772
Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis, Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging, p.173, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.913357
HANDBOOK of Selected Tissue Doses for Projections Common In Diagnostic Radiology. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 1988. ,
Breast Density: Comparison of Chest CT with Mammography, Radiology, vol.270, issue.1, pp.67-73, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.13130733
The effect of dose heterogeneity on radiation risk in medical imaging, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.155, issue.1, pp.42-58, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1093/rpd/ncs275
Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research. Task group 195, 2014. ,
Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry, Medical Physics, vol.49, issue.8, pp.5050-5059, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/49/24/003
Volumetric and Area-Based Breast Density Measurement in the Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening (PROCAS) Study, Breast Imaging, pp.228-235, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_30
Novel use of Single X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Breast Density, Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, vol.41, issue.2, pp.173-182, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01774016
Optimized exposure control in digital mammography, Medical Imaging 2004: Physics of Medical Imaging, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.535463
The effect of breast composition on absorbed dose and image contrast, Medical Physics, vol.16, issue.4, pp.544-542, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.596356
Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables, Medical Physics, vol.193, issue.4, pp.547-554, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.597937
We do not want to go back to the dark ages of breast screening, 2014. ,
Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns, JAMA, vol.247, issue.2, pp.185-189, 1982. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1982.03320270023016
Teaching atlas of mammography. Thieme, 2001. ,
Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software, European Radiology, vol.20, issue.6, pp.1265-1270, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-012-2380-y
Differences in breast density assessment using mammography, tomosynthesis and MRI and their implications for practice, The British Journal of Radiology, vol.86, issue.1032, p.20130528, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1259/bjr.20130528
Longitudinal Change in Mammographic Density and Association with Breast Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study, Breast Imaging, pp.205-211, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_27
Comparing personalized mean glandular dose estimates between X-ray systems over time in mammography, European Congress on Radiology, p.360, 2014. ,
Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetry, Medical Physics, vol.5, issue.5, pp.569-576, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.1668512
Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.25, issue.3, pp.273-282, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TMI.2005.862741
Changes in mammographic breast density and concomitant changes in breast cancer risk, European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol.8, issue.6, pp.509-515, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00008469-199912000-00006
3D density estimation in digital breast tomosynthesis: application to needle path planning for breast biopsy, Medical Imaging 2011: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.878169
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01050956
Dedicated breast CT: Fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population, Medical Physics, vol.213, issue.1, pp.7317-7328, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.3688197
Agreement of Mammographic Measures of Volumetric Breast Density to MRI, PLoS ONE, vol.57, issue.12, p.81653, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0081653.t003
Texture feature standardization in digital mammography for improving generalizability across devices, Medical Imaging 2013: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.2008149
From the Watching of Shadows, Journal of Clinical Engineering, vol.16, issue.3, p.11, 1948. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00004669-199105000-00016
Epoxy resin based tissue substitutes, The British Journal of Radiology, vol.50, issue.599, pp.814-821, 1977. ,
DOI : 10.1259/0007-1285-50-599-814
Variation in Mammographic Breast Density by Time in Menstrual Cycle Among Women Aged 40-49 Years, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.90, issue.12, pp.906-910, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/90.12.906
Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.126, issue.6, pp.1130-1139, 1976. ,
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130
Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography., Radiology, vol.179, issue.1, pp.143-148, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006265
Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography., Radiology, vol.193, issue.1, pp.83-89, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090926
Monochromatic CT image representation via fast switching dual kVp, Medical Imaging 2009: Physics of Medical Imaging, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1117/12.811698
The myth of the 50-50 breast, Medical Physics, vol.80, issue.6, pp.5437-5443, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308
Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998., The British Journal of Radiology, vol.73, issue.867, pp.278-287, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1259/bjr.73.867.10817044
Review of Dosimetric Methods for Mammography in the UK Breast Screening Programme, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.80, issue.1, pp.186-187, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032501
Objective characterization of GE Discovery CT750 HD scanner: Gemstone spectral imaging mode, Medical Physics, vol.3, issue.3, pp.1178-1188, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00004728-197902000-00013
Computerized image analysis: Estimation of breast density on mammograms, Medical Physics, vol.17, issue.6, pp.1056-1069, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1118/1.1376640