J. P. Gordon and H. Kogelnik, PMD fundamentals: Polarization mode dispersion in optical fibers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp.4541-4550, 2000.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4541

M. Born and . Wolf, Principles of Optics, 1999.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139644181

M. Froggatt, B. Soller, E. Moore, and M. Wolfe, Optical System Characterization : A Linear System Approach, 2002.

C. Whitney, Pauli-Algebraic Operators in Polarization Optics*, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol.61, issue.9, pp.1207-1213, 1971.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.61.001207

T. Tudor, Interaction of light with the polarization devices: a vectorial Pauli algebraic approach, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, issue.41, p.41415303, 2008.

S. Lu and A. Russell, Homogeneous and inhomogeneous Jones matrices, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.11, issue.2, pp.766-773, 1994.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.11.000766

S. Lu and A. Russell, Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.13, issue.5, pp.1106-1113, 1996.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.13.001106

R. and C. Jones, A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical SystemsI Description and Discussion of the Calculus, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol.31, issue.7, pp.488-493, 1941.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.31.000488

H. Hurwitz and R. C. Jones, A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems ? II. proof of three general equivalence theorems, Journal of Optical Society of America, issue.7, pp.31493-495, 1941.

R. and C. Jones, A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems ? III

R. and C. Jones, A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems IV, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol.32, issue.8, pp.486-493, 1942.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.32.000486

R. and C. Jones, A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems ? V. A more general formulation, and description of another calculus, p.107, 1947.

R. and C. Jones, A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical SystemsVI Experimental Determination of the Matrix*, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol.37, issue.2, p.110, 1947.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.37.000110

R. and C. Jones, A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems VII Properties of the N-Matrices, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol.38, issue.8, pp.671-683, 1948.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.38.000671

H. Mueller, Memorandum on the polarization optics of the photoelastic shutter. Report No. 2 of the OSRD project OEMsr-576, 1943.

K. Kim, L. Mandel, and E. Wolf, Relationship between Jones and Mueller matrices for random media, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.4, issue.3, pp.433-437, 1987.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.4.000433

G. M. Donald, R. Anderson, and . Barakat, Necessary and sufficient conditions for a Mueller matrix to be derivable from a Jones matrix, Journal of Optical Society of America A, vol.11, issue.8, pp.2305-2319, 1994.

T. /. Eia-, 455-157 ? EN-FOTP-157 Measurement of Polarization Dependent loss (PDL) of Single-Mode Fiber Optic Components

Y. Zhu, E. Simova, P. Berini, and C. P. Grover, A comparison of wavelength dependent polarization dependent loss measurements in fiber gratings, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol.49, issue.6, pp.1231-1239, 2000.

B. L. Heffner, Deterministic, analytically complete measurement of polarization-dependent transmission through optical devices, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol.4, issue.5, pp.451-454, 1992.
DOI : 10.1109/68.136483

R. M. Craig and C. Wang, Measurement Assurance Program for Wavelength Dependence of Polarization Dependent Loss in Fiber Optic Devices over the Wavelength Range from 1535 nm to 1560 nm (NIST Special Publication 250-60) Rapport technique, 2003.

R. M. Craig, Visualizing the Limitations of Four-State Measurement of PDL and Results of a Six-State Alternative, Tech. Dig., Symp. on Optical Fiber Meas, pp.121-124, 2002.

R. M. Craig, S. L. Gilbert, and P. D. Hale, High-resolution, nonmechanical approach to polarization-dependent transmission measurements, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol.16, issue.7, pp.1285-1294, 1998.
DOI : 10.1109/50.701407

R. M. Craig, Accurate spectral characterization of polarization-dependent loss, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol.21, issue.2, pp.432-437, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/JLT.2003.808761

Y. Zhu, Wavelength-Dependent Polarization Dependent Loss and Polarization Mode Dispersion Measurements in Fiber-Optic Devices, 1999.

N. Gisin, Statistics of polarization dependent losses, Optics Communications, vol.114, issue.5-6, pp.399-405, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-4018(95)00687-4

H. Lefevre, US Patent 6,832,022 B1? Rectangular response optical filter for partitioning a limited spectral interval, 2004.

P. and I. De, XTx-50 n o 1 avec une bande passante de 45 pm, p.100

P. and I. De, XTx-50 n o 2 avec une bande passante de 45 pm, p.101

P. and I. De, XTx-32 avec une bande passante de 45 pm, p.102

P. and I. De, XTx-32 avec une bande passante de 30 pm, p.106

N. Agilent, 1 Spécifications de l, p.146