A. Data, This table presents four estimations, using a panel of 1100 observed reactor.years across 58 reactors and 19 years In specifications (1) and (2), AGE is interacted with capacity group dummies. Specification (1) includes site fixed effects and year dummies. Specification (2) includes capacity group and time dummies, to measure the biases associated with the omission of cohort controls. Specifications (3) and (4) are respectively identical to (1) and (2), but allow for nonlinear treatment effects, Standard errors are clustered at the site level. Intercepts are omitted. Significance: ***1%; **5%; *10%, 1997.

M. V. Aarset, How to Identify a Bathtub Hazard Rate, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol.36, issue.1, pp.106-108, 1987.
DOI : 10.1109/TR.1987.5222310

M. D. Adler and C. Sanchirico, Inequality and uncertainty: Theory and legal applications, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, issue.155, pp.279-377, 2006.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.886571

URL : https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5238&context=faculty_scholarship

B. Adrangi, G. Chow, R. , and K. , Airline deregulation, safety and profitability, Transportation Journal, vol.36, issue.4, pp.44-52, 1997.

D. Alary, C. Gollier, and N. Treich, The Effect of Ambiguity Aversion on Insurance and Self-protection, The Economic Journal, vol.59, issue.1, pp.1188-1202, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.001

G. Allon and A. Bassamboo, Buying from the Babbling Retailer? The Impact of Availability Information on Customer Behavior, Management Science, vol.57, issue.4, pp.713-726, 2011.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1306

G. Allon, A. Bassamboo, and I. Gurvich, ???We Will Be Right with You???: Managing Customer Expectations with Vague Promises and Cheap Talk, Operations Research, vol.59, issue.6, pp.1382-1394, 2011.
DOI : 10.1287/opre.1110.0976

F. L. Alt, Archaelogy of computers: reminiscences, 1945-1947, Communications of the ACM, vol.15, issue.7, pp.693-694, 1972.
DOI : 10.1145/361454.361528

J. Angrist and J. Pischke, A Note on Bias in Just Identified IV with Weak Instruments (referering to Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion), 2009.

J. Angrist and J. Pischke, Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion, 2009.

N. Antic and N. Persico, Communication among shareholders, 2016.

G. A. Armstrong, Consumer safety and the regulation of industry, Managerial and Decision Economics, vol.2, issue.2, pp.67-73, 1981.
DOI : 10.1002/mde.4090020202

K. J. Arrow, M. L. Cropper, G. C. Eads, and R. W. Hahn, Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? Science, p.272221, 1996.

S. Athanassoglou and A. Xepapadeas, Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When, and how, to be precautious, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.63, issue.3, pp.304-320, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.11.001

P. Banerjee and J. F. Shogren, Regulation, reputation, and environmental risk, Economics Letters, vol.106, issue.1, pp.45-47, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.09.021

B. L. Barham, J. Chavas, D. Fitz, V. R. Salas, and L. Schechter, The roles of risk and ambiguity in technology adoption, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.97, pp.204-218, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.06.014

R. P. Barke and H. C. Jenkins-smith, Politics and Scientific Expertise: Scientists, Risk Perception, and Nuclear Waste Policy, Risk Analysis, vol.52, issue.4, pp.425-439, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00143739

S. Bastide, J. Moatti, and F. Fagnani, Risk Perception and Social Acceptability of Technologies: The French Case, Risk Analysis, vol.15, issue.2, pp.215-223, 1989.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb01242.x

G. S. Becker, Crime and punishment: An economic approach, Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment, pp.1-54, 1974.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-349-62853-7_2

A. Bell and K. Jones, The impossibility of separating age, period and cohort effects, Social Science & Medicine, vol.93, pp.163-165, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.029

A. Bell and K. Jones, Another 'futile quest'? A simulation study of Yang and Land's Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort model, Demographic Research, vol.30, p.333, 2014.
DOI : 10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.11

A. Bell and K. Jones, The hierarchical age???period???cohort model: Why does it find the results that it finds?, Quality & Quantity, vol.50, issue.6, pp.1-17, 2016.
DOI : 10.1007/s13524-013-0254-9

L. Berger, The impact of ambiguity prudence on insurance and prevention. FEEM Nota di Lavoro, 15, 2015.

L. Berger and V. Bosetti, Ellsberg Re-Revisited: An Experiment Disentangling Model Uncertainty and Risk Aversion, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp.37-2016, 2016.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2783677

URL : https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/142311/1/NDL2016-037.pdf

L. Berger, J. Emmerling, and M. Tavoni, Managing Catastrophic Climate Risks Under Model Uncertainty Aversion, Management Science, vol.63, issue.3, 2016.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2365

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01744501

M. Berthélemy and L. E. Rangel, Nuclear reactors' construction costs: The role of lead-time, standardization and technological progress, Energy Policy, vol.82, pp.118-130, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.015

T. F. Bewley, Knightian decision theory, part i. Decisions in Economics and Finance, pp.79-110, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/s102030200006

B. Biais, T. Mariotti, J. Rochet, and S. Villeneuve, Large risks, limited liability, and dynamic moral hazard, Econometrica, vol.78, issue.1, pp.73-118, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00491470

R. Bizet and F. Lévêque, The Economic Assessment of the Cost of Nuclear Accidents, Resilience: A New Paradigm of Nuclear Safety, pp.79-95, 2017.
DOI : 10.1111/0272-4332.204044

N. Boccard, The cost of nuclear electricity: France after Fukushima, Energy Policy, vol.66, pp.450-461, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.037

J. Boer, W. Wouter-botzen, and T. Terpstra, Improving Flood Risk Communication by Focusing on Prevention-Focused Motivation, Risk Analysis, vol.28, issue.1, pp.309-322, 2014.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01049.x

A. Bommier and S. Zuber, Can preferences for catastrophe avoidance reconcile social discounting with intergenerational equity? Social Choice and Welfare, pp.31415-434, 2008.

S. Borenstein and M. B. Zimmerman, Market incentives for safe commercial airline operation, The American Economic Review, vol.78, issue.5, pp.913-935, 1988.

S. Bose and L. Renou, Mechanism Design with Ambiguous Communication Devices, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.82, issue.5, pp.1853-1872, 2014.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1868132

L. Bovens and M. Fleurbaey, EVALUATING LIFE OR DEATH PROSPECTS, Economics and Philosophy, vol.28, issue.02, pp.217-249, 2012.
DOI : 10.1017/S0266267106001015

URL : http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46190/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_Bovens%2C%20L_Evaluating%20life_Bovens_Evaluating%20life_2014.pdf

M. Boyer and J. Laffont, Environmental risks and bank liability, European Economic Review, vol.41, issue.8, pp.411427-1459, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00034-7

URL : http://www.cirano.qc.ca/pdf/publication/94s-22.pdf

M. Boyer and J. Laffont, Toward a Political Theory of the Emergence of Environmental Incentive Regulation, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.30, issue.1, pp.137-157, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/2556050

U. S. Brandt, The implication of extreme events on policy responses, Journal of Risk Research, vol.107, issue.2, pp.221-240, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.002

P. Bressoux, F. Kramarz, and C. Prost, Teachers??? Training, Class Size and Students??? Outcomes: Learning from Administrative Forecasting Mistakes, The Economic Journal, vol.50, issue.3, pp.540-561, 2009.
DOI : 10.3368/jhr.XLI.4.778

J. P. Brown, Toward an Economic Theory of Liability, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.2, issue.2, pp.323-349, 1973.
DOI : 10.1086/467501

M. Brunette, L. Cabantous, S. Couture, and A. Stenger, The impact of governmental assistance on insurance demand under ambiguity: a theoretical model and an experimental test, Theory and Decision, vol.47, issue.2, pp.1-22, 2013.
DOI : 10.1057/9780230226203.1753

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01001032

J. M. Buchanan, Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory, chapter The Samaritan's Dilemma, 1975.

P. Burgherr and S. Hirshberg, Comparative risk assessment of severe accidents in the energy sector, Energy Policy, vol.74, pp.46-57, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.035

D. Butler, Reactors, residents and risk, Nature, vol.474, p.36, 2011.
DOI : 10.1038/472400a

A. C. Cameron and P. K. Trivedi, Regression analysis of count data, 2013.

F. Carlsson, D. Daruvala, and H. Jaldell, Do administrators have the same priorities for risk reductions as the general public?, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.21, issue.3, pp.79-95, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/0095-0696(91)90003-2

T. N. Cason, L. Friesen, and L. Gangadharan, Regulatory performance of audit tournaments and compliance observability, European Economic Review, vol.85, pp.288-306, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.009

A. Chateauneuf, R. Kast, and A. Lapied, CHOQUET PRICING FOR FINANCIAL MARKETS WITH FRICTIONS, Mathematical Finance, vol.14, issue.3, pp.323-330, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/1911158

Y. Chen, N. Kartik, and J. Sobel, Selecting Cheap-Talk Equilibria, Econometrica, vol.76, issue.1, pp.117-136, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.0012-9682.2008.00819.x

URL : http://www.columbia.edu/~nk2339/Papers/Published/nits.pdf

Y. Chen, Z. Wang, J. Qiu, B. Zheng, and H. Huang, Adaptive bathtub hazard rate curve modelling via transformed radial basis functions, 2011 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering, pp.110-114, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/ICQR2MSE.2011.5976579

G. Chichilnisky, An axiomatic approach to choice under uncertainty with catastrophic risks, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.22, issue.3, pp.221-231, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0928-7655(00)00032-4

R. H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol.3, pp.1-44, 1960.
DOI : 10.1086/466560

S. Coate, Altruism, the samaritan's dilemma, and government transfer policy, The American Economic Review, pp.46-57, 1995.

T. B. Cochran, GLOBAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE FUKUSHIMA DISASTER FOR NUCLEAR POWER, International Seminar on Nuclear War and Planetary Emergencies: 44th Session: the Role of Science in the Third Millenium, p.137, 2012.
DOI : 10.1142/9789814415019_0010

B. L. Cohen, A test of the linear-no threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis, Environmental Research, vol.53, issue.2, pp.193-220, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/S0013-9351(05)80119-7

B. L. Cohen, Test of the Linear-No Threshold Theory of Radiation Carcinogenesis for Inhaled Radon Decay Products, Health Physics, vol.68, issue.2, pp.157-174, 1995.
DOI : 10.1097/00004032-199502000-00002

V. P. Crawford and J. Sobel, Strategic Information Transmission, Econometrica, vol.50, issue.6, pp.1431-1451, 1982.
DOI : 10.2307/1913390

H. Crès, I. Gilboa, and N. Vieille, Aggregation of multiple prior opinions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.146, issue.6, pp.2563-2582, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2011.06.018

L. W. Davis, Prospects for Nuclear Power, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.26, issue.1, pp.49-65, 2012.
DOI : 10.1257/jep.26.1.49

L. W. Davis and C. Wolfram, Deregulation, Consolidation, and Efficiency: Evidence from US Nuclear Power, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol.4, issue.4, pp.194-225, 2012.
DOI : 10.1257/app.4.4.194

H. Demsetz, When Does the Rule of Liability Matter?, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.1, issue.1, pp.13-28, 1972.
DOI : 10.1086/467477

D. 'haeseleer and W. D. , Synthesis on the economics of nuclear energy, 2013.

P. A. Diamond, Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility: Comment, Journal of Political Economy, vol.75, issue.5, pp.765-766, 1967.
DOI : 10.1086/259353

G. Dionne, R. Gagné, F. Gagnon, and C. Vanasse, Debt, moral hazard and airline safety An empirical evidence, Journal of Econometrics, vol.79, issue.2, pp.379-402, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-4076(97)82989-2

M. Doss, Linear No-Threshold Model vs. Radiation Hormesis, Dose-Response, vol.60, issue.4, p.dose? response, 2013.
DOI : 10.1097/HP.0b013e3182609ba4

URL : http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2203/dose-response.13-005.Doss

J. Dow and S. R. Werlang, Uncertainty aversion, risk aversion, and the optimal choice of portfolio, Econometrica, pp.197-204, 1992.

J. Downer, Disowning Fukushima: Managing the credibility of nuclear reliability assessment in the wake of disaster, Regulation & Governance, vol.18, issue.1, pp.287-309, 2014.
DOI : 10.1177/030631288018001006

S. A. Drakopoulos and I. Theodossiou, Workers??? risk underestimation and occupational health and safety regulation, European Journal of Law and Economics, vol.15, issue.1, pp.641-656, 2016.
DOI : 10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.1

URL : http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29643/1/MPRA_paper_29643.pdf

M. Dreicer, V. Tort, and P. Manen, Externe: Externalities of energy, 1995.

B. Drottz-sjöberg and L. Sjoberg, Risk perception and worries after the chernobyl accident, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.10, issue.2, pp.135-149, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80124-0

Y. Du and J. E. Parsons, Update on the cost of nuclear power. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research Working Paper, pp.9-13, 2009.

J. A. Dubin and G. S. Rothwell, SUBSIDY TO NUCLEAR POWER THROUGH PRICE-ANDERSON LIABILITY LIMIT, Contemporary Economic Policy, vol.8, issue.3, pp.73-79, 1990.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1990.tb00645.x

E. Duflo, M. Greenstone, R. Pande, R. , and N. , Truth-telling by third-party auditors and the response of polluting firms: Experimental evidence from India, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013.

L. Eeckhoudt, C. Schieber, and T. Schneider, Risk aversion and the external cost of a nuclear accident, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.58, issue.2, pp.109-117, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/jema.1999.0314

I. Ehrlich and G. S. Becker, Market Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-Protection, Journal of Political Economy, vol.80, issue.4, pp.623-648, 1972.
DOI : 10.1086/259916

J. Eichberger, S. Grant, D. Kelsey, and G. A. Koshevoy, The ??-MEU model: A comment, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.146, issue.4, pp.1684-1698, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2011.03.019

D. Ellsberg, Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.75, issue.4, pp.643-669, 1961.
DOI : 10.2307/1884324

K. Engel, G. Frerks, L. Velotti, J. Warner, and B. Weijs, Flood disaster subcultures in The Netherlands: the parishes of Borgharen and Itteren, Natural Hazards, vol.25, issue.5, pp.859-882, 2014.
DOI : 10.2307/2090136

L. Epstein and M. Schneider, Recursive multiple-priors, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.113, issue.1, pp.1-31, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00097-8

URL : http://static.luiss.it/hey/ambiguity/papers/Epstein_Schneider_2003.pdf

L. G. Epstein and M. Schneider, Ambiguity, Information Quality, and Asset Pricing, The Journal of Finance, vol.56, issue.1, pp.197-228, 2008.
DOI : 10.2307/1911841

L. G. Epstein and T. Wang, Intertemporal asset pricing under knightian uncertainty, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp.283-322, 1994.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203358061_chapter_18

R. A. Epstein, Catastrophic responses to catastrophic risks, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.52, issue.2-3, pp.287-308, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00055799

M. F. Evans, S. M. Gilpatric, and L. Liu, Regulation with direct benefits of information disclosure and imperfect monitoring, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.57, issue.3, pp.284-292, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.08.003

H. Ewers and K. Rennings, Die volkswirtschatlichen kosten eine super-gau's in biblis, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, pp.379-396, 1991.

H. Ewers and K. Rennings, Abschätzung der Schäden durch einen sogennanten Super- GAU, 1992.

I. Fairlie and D. Summer, The other report on chernobyl, 2006.

J. Farrell and R. Gibbons, Cheap talk with two audiences, The American Economic Review, vol.79, issue.5, pp.1214-1223, 1989.

M. G. Faure and G. Skogh, Compensation for Damages Caused by Nuclear Accidents: A Convention as Insurance, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, vol.17, issue.4, pp.499-513, 1992.
DOI : 10.1057/gpp.1992.37

J. S. Feinstein, The Safety Regulation of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants: Violations, Inspections, and Abnormal Occurrences, Journal of Political Economy, vol.97, issue.1, pp.115-154, 1989.
DOI : 10.1086/261595

P. M. Figueroa, Risk communication surrounding the Fukushima nuclear disaster: an anthropological approach, Asia Europe Journal, vol.7, issue.3, pp.53-64, 2013.
DOI : 10.1002/ieam.230

R. Filer and D. L. Golbe, Debt, operating margin and workplace safety, Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.51, issue.3, pp.359-381, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6451.00205

B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein, the public " vs the experts " : Perceived vs. actual disagreements about risks of nuclear power. In The analysis of actual versus perceived risks, pp.235-249, 1983.

M. Fleurbaey, Assessing Risky Social Situations, Journal of Political Economy, vol.118, issue.4, pp.649-680, 2010.
DOI : 10.1086/656513

URL : http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27006/1/Assessing_risky_social_situations_%28LSERO%29.pdf

M. Fleurbaey and S. Zuber, Fair management of social risk, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.169, pp.666-706, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2017.03.009

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00973480

T. Gajdos, J. Tallon, and J. Vergneaud, Representation and aggregation of preferences under uncertainty, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.141, issue.1, pp.68-99, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2007.10.001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00266049

P. Ghirardato, Agency theory with non-additive uncertainty, 1994.

P. Ghirardato, F. Maccheroni, and M. Marinacci, Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.118, issue.2, pp.133-173, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2003.12.004

URL : http://web.econ.unito.it/gma/paolo/diff.pdf

I. Gilboa, Uncertainty in Economic Theory -Essays in honor of David Schmeidler's 65th birthday, 2004.

I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.18, issue.2, pp.141-153, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00753237

S. M. Gilpatric, C. A. Vossler, and M. Mckee, Regulatory enforcement with competitive endogenous audit mechanisms, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.40, issue.2, pp.292-312, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00056-8

R. Giraud and L. Thomas, Ambiguity, optimism, and pessimism in adverse selection models, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.171, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2017.06.004

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01199139

N. D. Glenn, Cohort analysis, Sage, vol.5, 2005.
DOI : 10.4135/9781412983662

F. Gonzalez, Precautionary Principle and Robustness for a Stock Pollutant with Multiplicative Risk, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.73, issue.3, pp.25-46, 2008.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.91.2.60

P. Gottardi, J. M. Tallon, and P. Ghirardato, Flexible contracts, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.103, pp.145-167, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2016.01.013

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00429784

H. G. Grabowski and J. M. Vernon, Consumer product safety regulation, The American Economic Review, vol.68, pp.284-289, 1978.

W. B. Gray, The cost of regulation: Osha, epa and the productivity slowdown, The American Economic Review, vol.77, issue.5, pp.998-1006, 1987.

W. B. Gray and J. P. Shimshack, The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol.27, issue.3, pp.3-24, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00200.x

S. Grepperud, Optimal safety standards when accident prevention depends upon both firm and worker effort, European Journal of Law and Economics, vol.41, issue.4, pp.1-17, 2014.
DOI : 10.2307/2296698

A. Grubler, The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing, Energy Policy, vol.38, issue.9, pp.5174-5188, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.003

T. Grüne-yanoff and H. Rosencrantz, Beneficial safety decreases, Theory and Decision, vol.32, issue.1, pp.195-213, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s11238-010-9235-2

J. K. Hammitt, Positive versus Normative Justifications for Benefit-Cost Analysis: Implications for Interpretation and Policy, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol.8, issue.5, pp.199-218, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-015-8925-3_1

L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Robust Control and Model Uncertainty, American Economic Review, vol.91, issue.2, pp.60-66, 2001.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.91.2.60

I. Hansson and G. Skogh, Moral Hazard and Safety Regulation, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, vol.12, issue.2, pp.132-144, 1987.
DOI : 10.1057/gpp.1987.10

URL : https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057%2Fgpp.1987.10.pdf

J. C. Harsanyi, Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility, Journal of Political Economy, vol.63, issue.4, pp.309-321, 1955.
DOI : 10.1086/257678

R. Hasegawa, Disaster evacuation from japan's 2011 tsunami disaster and the fukushima nuclear accident, Studies, 2013.

C. Hausman, Corporate Incentives and Nuclear Safety, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol.6, issue.3, pp.178-206, 2014.
DOI : 10.1257/pol.6.3.178

URL : http://ei.haas.berkeley.edu/pdf/working_papers/WP223.pdf

F. Hayashi, Econometrics, 2000.

M. Hayashi and L. Hughes, The Fukushima nuclear accident and its effect on global energy security, Energy Policy, vol.59, pp.102-111, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.046

K. Haynes, J. Barclay, P. , and N. , The issue of trust and its influence on risk communication during a volcanic crisis, Bulletin of Volcanology, vol.6, issue.5, pp.605-621, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10

J. J. Heckman, S. Urzua, and E. Vytlacil, Understanding Instrumental Variables in Models with Essential Heterogeneity, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.62, issue.3, pp.389-432, 2006.
DOI : 10.2307/1392256

C. Henry and M. Henry, Formalization and applications of the precautionary principles. Columbia Discussion Papers Series, 2002.

A. Heyes and C. Heyes, An empirical analysis of the Nuclear Liability Act (1970) in Canada, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.22, issue.1, pp.91-101, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0928-7655(99)00013-5

A. Heyes and C. Liston-heyes, Capping Environmental Liability: The Case of North American Nuclear Power, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, vol.25, issue.2, pp.196-202, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/1468-0440.00059

A. G. Heyes and C. Liston-heyes, SUBSIDY TO NUCLEAR POWER THROUGH PRICE-ANDERSON LIABILITY LIMIT: COMMENT, Contemporary Economic Policy, vol.16, issue.1, pp.122-124, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1998.tb00506.x

Y. Hiriart and D. Martimort, How much discretion for risk regulators?, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.66, issue.2, pp.283-314, 2012.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00147.x

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00813175

Y. Hiriart, D. Martimort, and J. Pouyet, On the optimal use of ex ante regulation and ex post liability, Economics Letters, vol.84, issue.2, pp.231-235, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.02.007

Y. Hiriart, D. Martimort, and J. Pouyet, The public management of risk: Separating ex ante and ex post monitors, Journal of Public Economics, vol.94, issue.11-12, pp.1008-1019, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.07.005

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00566863

S. Hirschberg, P. Burgherr, G. Spiekerman, and R. Dones, Severe accidents in the energy sector: comparative perspective, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol.111, issue.1-3, pp.57-65, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.009

M. Hofert and M. V. Wüthrich, Statistical review of nuclear power accidents, Asia- Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol.7, pp.1-13, 2011.

O. Hohmeyer, Latest results of the international discussion on the social costs of energy -how does wind compare today?, 1990.

T. R. Holford, The Estimation of Age, Period and Cohort Effects for Vital Rates, Biometrics, vol.39, issue.2, pp.311-324, 1983.
DOI : 10.2307/2531004

T. R. Holford, Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates. Annual review of public health, pp.425-457, 1991.

A. M. Hooker, M. Bhat, T. K. Day, J. M. Lane, S. J. Swinburne et al., The Linear No-Threshold Model does not Hold for Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation, Radiation Research, vol.162, issue.4, pp.447-452, 2004.
DOI : 10.1667/RR3228

L. Huang, Y. Zhou, Y. Han, J. K. Hammitt, J. Bi et al., Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp.11019742-19747, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00283-2

A. Huhtala and P. Remes, Quantifying the social costs of nuclear energy: Perceived risk of accident at nuclear power plants, Energy Policy, vol.105, pp.320-331, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.052

I. Nea, Technology roadmap: Nuclear energy, 2015.

. Preiss, . Wissel, . Fahl, . Friedrich, and A. Voß, Die risiken der kernenergie in deutschland im vergleich mit risiken anderer stromerzeugungstechnologien, IER, 2013.

N. Ju and J. Miao, Ambiguity, Learning, and Asset Returns, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.80, issue.2, pp.559-591, 2012.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1017034

URL : http://www.bu.edu/econ/seminars/macroeconomics/paperfall07/asset26.pdf

E. Karni, A reformulation of the maxmin expected utility model with application to agency theory, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.45, issue.1-2, pp.97-112, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jmateco.2008.07.008

R. E. Kasperson, O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel et al., The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework, Risk Analysis, vol.56, issue.4, pp.177-187, 1988.
DOI : 10.1177/107769907905600420

R. L. Kathren, Pathway to a Paradigm, Health Physics, vol.70, issue.5, 1996.
DOI : 10.1097/00004032-199605000-00002

M. T. Katzman, Pollution Liability Insurance and Catastrophic Environmental Risk, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol.55, issue.1, pp.75-100, 1988.
DOI : 10.2307/253282

K. Kawamura, A model of public consultation: why is binary communication so common? The Economic Journal, pp.819-842, 2011.

T. E. Keeler, Highway safety, economic behavior, and driving enforcement, The American Economic Review, vol.84, issue.3, pp.684-693, 1994.

C. Kellner, Tournaments as a response to ambiguity aversion in incentive contracts, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.159, pp.627-655, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2015.08.002

C. Kellner, L. Quement, and M. , Endogenous ambiguity in cheap talk, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.173, 1701.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2017.10.007

K. M. Keyes, B. F. Grant, and D. S. Hasin, Evidence for a closing gender gap in alcohol use, abuse, and dependence in the United States population, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol.93, issue.1-2, pp.21-29, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.08.017

K. M. Keyes, R. L. Utz, W. Robinson, L. , and G. , What is a cohort effect? comparison of three statistical methods for modeling cohort effects in obesity prevalence in the united states, Social science & medicine, issue.7, pp.701100-1108, 1971.

M. Kivimäki and R. Kalimo, Risk Perception Among Nuclear Power Plant Personnel: A Survey, Risk Analysis, vol.3, issue.4, pp.421-424, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1

P. Klibanoff, M. Marinacci, and S. Mukerji, A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity, Econometrica, vol.73, issue.6, pp.1849-1892, 2005.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00640.x

P. Klibanoff, M. Marinacci, and S. Mukerji, Recursive smooth ambiguity preferences, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.144, issue.3, pp.930-976, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2008.10.007

URL : http://are.berkeley.edu/courses/ARE263/fall2008/paper/Ambiguity/Klibanoff etal_Recursive Smooth Ambiguity Preferences_WP07.pdf

F. H. Knight, From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, 1921.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511817410.005

URL : https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/imgsrv/download/pdf?id=loc.ark%3A%2F13960%2Ft2j687w8t;orient=0;size=100;seq=7;attachment=0

C. D. Kolstad, T. S. Ulen, J. , and G. V. , Ex post liability for harm vs ex ante safety regulation: Substitutes or complements, The American Economic Review, vol.80, pp.888-901, 1990.

D. M. Kreps, A Representation Theorem for "Preference for Flexibility", Econometrica, vol.47, issue.3, pp.565-577, 1979.
DOI : 10.2307/1910406

H. Kunreuther, Causes of Underinsurance against Natural Disasters, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, vol.9, issue.2, pp.206-220, 1984.
DOI : 10.1057/gpp.1984.12

H. Kunreuther, Mitigating disaster losses through insurance, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.95, issue.2-3, pp.171-187, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00055792

H. Kunreuther, Rethinking Society's Management of Catastrophic Risks, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, vol.22, issue.2, pp.151-176, 1997.
DOI : 10.1057/gpp.1997.12

H. Kunreuther, Disaster Mitigation and Insurance: Learning from Katrina, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol.604, issue.1, pp.208-227, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F

H. Kunreuther, R. Meyer, and E. Michel-kerjan, The Behavioral Foundation of Policy, chapter Overcoming Decision Biases to Reduce Losses from Natural Catastrophes, pp.398-413, 2013.

F. E. Kydland and E. C. Prescott, Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans, Journal of Political Economy, vol.85, issue.3, pp.473-491, 1977.
DOI : 10.1086/260580

J. Laffont, Regulation, moral hazard and insurance of environmental risks, Journal of Public Economics, vol.58, issue.3, pp.319-336, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0047-2727(94)01488-A

D. M. Lemoine and C. P. Traeger, Tipping points and ambiguity in the economics of climate change, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012.
DOI : 10.3386/w18230

T. Lewis and D. Nickerson, Self-insurance against natural disasters, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.16, issue.3, pp.209-223, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0095-0696(89)90010-7

M. S. Lewis-beck and J. Alford, Can Government Regulate Safety? The Coal Mine Example, American Political Science Review, vol.16, issue.03, pp.745-756, 1980.
DOI : 10.1037/h0027982

L. Lin, Enforcement of pollution levies in China, Journal of Public Economics, vol.98, pp.32-43, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.11.004

J. R. Lovering, A. Yip, and T. Nordhaus, Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors, Energy Policy, vol.91, pp.371-382, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.011

F. Lévêque, The Economics and Uncertainties of Nuclear Power, 2014.

F. Lévêque, The Economics and Uncertainties of Nuclear Power, 2015.

F. Lévêque, Vers une industrie nucléaire globalisée ? The Conversation France, 2015.

I. Macho-stadler and D. Pérez-castrillo, Optimal enforcement policy and firms??? emissions and compliance with environmental taxes, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.51, issue.1, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2005.06.001

E. Maidl and M. Buchecker, Raising risk preparedness through flood risk communication, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions, p.167, 2014.
DOI : 10.5194/nhessd-2-167-2014-supplement

URL : https://doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-2-167-2014

M. Marinacci, MODEL UNCERTAINTY, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol.22, issue.1, pp.1022-1100, 2015.
DOI : 10.1177/0963721412469396

K. O. Mason, W. M. Mason, H. H. Winsborough, and W. K. Poole, Some Methodological Issues in Cohort Analysis of Archival Data, American Sociological Review, vol.38, issue.2, pp.242-258, 1973.
DOI : 10.2307/2094398

Y. Matsuo, A study on the estimation method of nuclear accident risk cost, 2016.

R. N. Mckean, Enforcement costs in environmental and safety regulation, Policy analysis, vol.6, pp.269-289, 1980.

T. A. Melkonyan and J. Schubert, Food Safety Regulations under Ambiguity, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.87, issue.1, pp.1389-1396, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-3472-7

R. Michener and C. Tighe, A poisson regression model of highway fatalities, Papers and Proceeedings of the Hundred and Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, pp.452-456, 1992.

A. Millner, S. Dietz, and G. Heal, Scientific Ambiguity and Climate Policy, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.14, issue.2, pp.21-46, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2011.01539.x

G. Moscarini, Competence Implies Credibility, American Economic Review, vol.97, issue.1, pp.37-63, 2007.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.97.1.37

L. N. Moses and I. Savage, Aviation deregulation and safety: Theory and evidence, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, vol.24, issue.2, pp.171-188, 1990.

G. S. Mudholkar and D. K. Srivastava, Exponentiated Weibull family for analyzing bathtub failure-rate data, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol.42, issue.2, pp.299-302, 1993.
DOI : 10.1109/24.229504

S. Mukerji, Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of contractual form, American Economic Review, pp.1207-1231, 1998.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203358061_chapter_14

S. Mukerji, Ambiguity aversion and cost-plus procurement contracts, 2003.

G. R. Neumann and J. P. Nelson, Safety Regulation and Firm Size: Effects of the Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol.25, issue.2, pp.183-199, 1982.
DOI : 10.1086/467012

A. M. Oestreich, Firms??? Emissions and Self-Reporting Under Competitive Audit Mechanisms, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.33, issue.1, pp.949-978, 2015.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1979.tb00657.x

R. L. Ottinger, D. R. Wooley, N. A. Robinson, D. R. Hodas, and S. E. Babb, Environmental Costs of Electricity, 1990.

E. Paté-cornell, Risk and Uncertainty Analysis in Government Safety Decisions, Risk Analysis, vol.27, issue.4, pp.633-646, 2002.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.27.4.479

M. E. Paté-cornell, Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.54, issue.2-3, pp.95-111, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00067-1

T. Perko, Importance of risk communication during and after a nuclear accident. Integrated environmental assessment and management, pp.388-392, 2011.

E. Peters and P. Slovic, The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol.1, issue.16, pp.1427-1453, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037//0003-066X.35.2.151

N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, The social amplification of risk, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511550461

K. Pljansek, M. Ferrer, T. De-groeve, C. , and I. , Science for disaster risk management 2017: Knowing better and losing less, 2017.

P. R. Portney, Trouble in Happyville, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol.11, issue.1, pp.131-132, 1992.
DOI : 10.2307/3325137

G. Prati and B. Zani, The Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on Risk Perception, Antinuclear Behavioral Intentions, Attitude, Trust, Environmental Beliefs, and Values, Environment and Behavior, vol.6, issue.6, pp.45782-798, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.002

A. Rabl and V. A. Rabl, External costs of nuclear: Greater or less than the alternatives? Energy Policy, pp.575-584, 2013.

S. Raghavan and D. L. Rhoades, Revisiting the relationship between profitability and air carrier safety in the US airline industry, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol.11, issue.4, pp.283-290, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.01.003

M. Ramana, Beyond our imagination: Fukushima and the problem of assessing risk, Bulletin of the atomic scientists, vol.19, pp.37-62, 2011.

M. Ramana, Nuclear power and the public, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol.64, issue.3, pp.43-51, 2011.
DOI : 10.1177/0013916512440435

K. W. Ramsay, 'Cheap Talk' Diplomacy, Voluntary Negotiations, and Variable Bargaining Power, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.55, issue.4, pp.1003-1023, 2011.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1800074

L. E. Rangel and F. Lévêque, Revisiting the cost escalation curse of nuclear power: New lessons from the french experience. econ, Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, vol.4, issue.2, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00780566

L. E. Rangel and F. Lévêque, How Fukushima Dai-ichi core meltdown changed the probability of nuclear accidents?, Safety Science, vol.64, pp.90-98, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.017

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01110974

N. Rasmussen, Wash-1400 (reactor safety study) An assessment of accident risks in US Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, 1975.

C. M. Rheinberger and N. Treich, Attitudes Toward Catastrophe, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.12, issue.3, pp.1-28, 2016.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00055789

L. Rigotti, Imprecise Beliefs in a Principal Agent Model, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp.1998-128, 1998.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.166452

L. S. Robertson, Automobile safety regulations and death reductions in the United States., American Journal of Public Health, vol.71, issue.8, pp.71818-822, 1981.
DOI : 10.2105/AJPH.71.8.818

N. L. Rose, Profitability and Product Quality: Economic Determinants of Airline Safety Performance, Journal of Political Economy, vol.98, issue.5, Part 1, pp.944-964, 1990.
DOI : 10.1086/261714

S. Rothman and S. R. Lichter, Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy, The American Political Science Review, vol.81, issue.2, pp.383-404, 1987.
DOI : 10.2307/1961958

G. Rothwell, Does the us subsidize nuclear power insurance, 2002.

G. Rothwell, Economics of Nuclear Power. Routledge, 2016.

F. Salanié and N. Treich, Regulation in Happyville, The Economic Journal, vol.89, issue.1, pp.665-679, 2009.
DOI : 10.1257/000282803321947029

S. Salop, Information and monopolistic competition, Papers and Proceedings, pp.240-245, 1976.

L. J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics, 1954.

D. Schmeidler, Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity, Econometrica, vol.57, issue.3, pp.571-587, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/1911053

URL : http://www.dklevine.com/archive/refs47662.pdf

S. Selvin, Statistical analysis of epidemiologic data, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195172805.001.0001

S. Shavell, Liability for Harm versus Regulation of Safety, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.13, issue.2, pp.357-374, 1984.
DOI : 10.1086/467745

S. Shavell, A Model of the Optimal Use of Liability and Safety Regulation, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.15, issue.2, pp.271-280, 1984.
DOI : 10.2307/2555680

J. P. Shimshack, The Economics of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement, Annual Review of Resource Economics, vol.6, issue.1, pp.339-360, 2014.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151821

L. Sjöberg, Worry and Risk Perception, Risk Analysis, vol.16, issue.1, pp.85-93, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(80)90039-6

L. Sjöberg, Risk Perception: Experts and the Public, European Psychologist, vol.3, issue.1, pp.1-9, 1999.
DOI : 10.1027/1016-9040.3.1.1

L. Sjöberg, The Allegedly Simple Structure of Experts??? Risk Perception: An Urban Legend in Risk Research, Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol.4, issue.3, pp.443-459, 2002.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb01338.x

L. Sjöberg, Explaining Individual Risk Perception: The Case of Nuclear Waste, Risk Management, vol.6, issue.1, pp.51-64, 2004.
DOI : 10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240172

L. Sjöberg, Precautionary attitudes and the acceptance of a local nuclear waste repository, Safety Science, vol.47, issue.4, pp.542-546, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.035

L. Sjöberg and B. Drottz-sjöberg, Knowledge and Risk Perception Among Nuclear Power Plant Employees, Risk Analysis, vol.9, issue.4, pp.607-618, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/S0272-4944(85)80040-2

L. Sjoberg and B. Drottz-sjoberg, Public risk perception of nuclear waste, International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, vol.11, issue.3/4, pp.248-280, 2009.
DOI : 10.1504/IJRAM.2009.023156

P. Slovic, Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy, Risk Analysis, vol.8, issue.6, pp.675-682, 1993.
DOI : 10.1057/gpp.1992.26

URL : http://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/1794/22413/1/slovic_319.pdf

P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough, pp.181-214, 1980.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9

URL : http://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/1794/22316/1/slovic_132.pdf

P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, Rating the risks, Risk/benefit analysis in water resources planning and management, pp.193-217, 1981.

P. Slovic, M. Layman, F. , and J. H. , Risk perception, trust, and nuclear waste: Lessons from yucca mountain. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, pp.6-30, 1991.
DOI : 10.1080/00139157.1991.9931375

URL : http://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/1794/22404/1/slovic_279.pdf

B. K. Sovacool, The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907???2007, Energy Policy, vol.36, issue.5, pp.1802-1820, 1907.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.040

C. Starr, Social Benefit versus Technological Risk, Science, vol.165, issue.3899, pp.1232-1238, 1969.
DOI : 10.1126/science.165.3899.1232

J. C. Stein, Cheap talk and the fed: A theory of imprecise policy announcements, The American Economic Review, pp.32-42, 1989.

J. Strand, Environmental accidents under moral hazard and limited firm liability, Environmental & Resource Economics, vol.73, issue.5, pp.495-509, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00691925

E. Suzuki, Time changes, so do people, Social Science & Medicine, vol.75, issue.3, pp.452-456, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.036

T. Teh, Insurance design in the presence of safety nets, Journal of Public Economics, vol.149, pp.47-58, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.03.001

K. Telle, Monitoring and Enforcement of Environmental Regulations: Lessons from a Natural Field Experiment in Norway, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.99, pp.24-34, 2013.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2002986

T. O. Tengs, M. E. Adams, J. S. Pliskin, D. G. Safran, J. E. Siegel et al., Five-Hundred Life-Saving Interventions and Their Cost-Effectiveness, Risk Analysis, vol.40, issue.34, pp.369-390, 1995.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00330.x

A. D. Tillio, N. Kos, and M. Messner, The Design of Ambiguous Mechanisms, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.62, issue.1, pp.237-276, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2007.03.009

J. Tollefson, Nuclear power plants prepare for old age, Nature, vol.537, issue.7618, pp.16-17, 2016.
DOI : 10.1038/537016a

R. F. Trager, Diplomatic Calculus in Anarchy: How Communication Matters, American Political Science Review, vol.10, issue.02, pp.347-368, 2010.
DOI : 10.3998/mpub.14453

N. Treich, The value of a statistical life under ambiguity aversion, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.59, issue.1, pp.15-26, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.001

M. Tubiana, L. E. Feinendegen, C. Yang, and J. M. Kaminski, The Linear No-Threshold Relationship Is Inconsistent with Radiation Biologic and Experimental Data, Radiology, vol.251, issue.1, pp.13-22, 2009.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2511080671

J. W. Tukey, Exploratory data analysis, 1977.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Environmental Impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis, pp.107-129, 1985.

K. W. Viscusi, The Impact of Occupational Safety and Health Regulation, The Bell Journal of Economics, vol.10, issue.1, pp.117-140, 1979.
DOI : 10.2307/3003322

F. N. Von-hippel and M. Schoeppner, Reducing the Danger from Fires in Spent Fuel Pools, Science & Global Security, vol.24, issue.3, pp.141-173, 2016.
DOI : 10.1080/08929882.2016.1235382

A. A. Wahlberg and L. Sjoberg, Risk perception and the media, Journal of Risk Research, vol.3, issue.1, pp.31-50, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-3395-8_7

S. Wheatley, B. Sovacool, and D. Sornette, Of Disasters and Dragon Kings: A Statistical Analysis of Nuclear Power Incidents and Accidents, Risk Analysis, vol.8, issue.1, pp.99-115, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.erss.2015.04.007

S. C. Whitfield, E. A. Rosa, A. Dan, and T. Dietz, The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception, Risk Analysis, vol.93, issue.3, pp.425-437, 2009.
DOI : 10.1511/2005.54.969

A. J. Wilson, M. Dean, and J. P. Higham, A game theoretic approach to multimodal communication, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol.53, issue.1519, pp.1399-1415, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3

D. Wittman, Prior Regulation versus Post Liability: The Choice between Input and Output Monitoring, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.6, issue.1, pp.193-211, 1977.
DOI : 10.1086/467567

J. Wooldridge, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2002.

J. M. Wooldridge, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2002.

J. M. Wooldridge, Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics, Journal of Human Resources, vol.50, issue.2, pp.420-445, 2015.
DOI : 10.3368/jhr.50.2.420

M. Xie, Y. Tang, and T. N. Goh, A modified Weibull extension with bathtub-shaped failure rate function, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.76, issue.3, pp.279-285, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00022-4

Y. Yang and K. C. Land, A Mixed Models Approach to the Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Repeated Cross-Section Surveys, with an Application to Data on Trends in Verbal Test Scores, Sociological Methodology, vol.5, issue.1, pp.75-97, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00148.x

S. Zahran, T. Iverson, S. Weiler, and A. Underwood, Evidence that the accuracy of self-reported lead emissions data improved: A puzzle and discussion, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.409, issue.7, pp.235-257, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.036

H. Zhang, W. Yan, A. Oba, and W. Zhang, Radiation-Driven Migration: The Case of Minamisoma City, Fukushima, Japan, after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol.3, issue.471, pp.9286-9305, 2014.
DOI : 10.1257/jep.22.4.135