M. Wei and H. A. Steen, Comparison of reciprocal recurrent selection with pure-line selection systems in animal breeding (a review), Anim Breed Abstr, vol.59, pp.281-98, 1991.

M. Wei and J. Van-der-werf, Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information, Anim Prod, vol.59, pp.401-414, 1994.

K. A. Weigel, G. De-los-campos, A. I. Vazquez, G. J. Rosa, D. Gianola et al., Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.93, pp.5423-5458, 2010.

Y. C. Wientjes, R. F. Veerkamp, and M. P. Calus, The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction, Genetics, vol.193, pp.621-652, 2013.

J. Zeng, A. Toosi, R. Fernando, J. Dekkers, and D. Garrick, Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.45, p.11, 2013.

Z. Zhang and T. Druet, Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.93, pp.5487-94, 2010.

T. Meuwissen, B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard, Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps, Genetics, vol.157, pp.1819-1848, 2001.

Y. Li, C. Willer, S. Sanna, and G. Abecasis, Genotype imputation, Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, vol.10, pp.387-406, 2009.

B. J. Hayes, P. J. Bowman, H. D. Daetwyler, J. W. Kijas, and J. H. Van-der-werf, Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds, Anim Genet, vol.43, pp.72-80, 2012.

D. Habier, R. L. Fernando, and J. Dekkers, Chapter 2: Imputation of purebred and crossbred genotypes using low-density panels 47, Genetics, vol.182, pp.343-53, 2009.

J. M. Hickey, J. Crossa, R. Babu, and G. De-los-campos, Factors affecting the accuracy of genotype imputation in populations from several maize breeding programs, Crop Sci, vol.52, pp.654-63, 2012.

A. Loberg and J. Dürr, Interbull survey on the use of genomic information, Interbull Bull, vol.39, pp.3-14, 2009.

J. E. Fulton, Genomic selection for poultry breeding, Anim Front, vol.2, pp.30-36, 2012.

N. Ibán?z-escriche, R. L. Fernando, A. Toosi, and J. Dekkers, Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance, Genet Sel Evol, vol.41, p.12, 2009.

O. F. Christensen, P. Madsen, B. Nielsen, and G. Su, Genomic evaluation of both purebred and crossbred performances, Genet Sel Evol, vol.46, p.23, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341227

J. C. Dekkers, Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance, J Anim Sci, vol.85, pp.2104-2118, 2007.

S. R. Browning, Missing data imputation and haplotype phase inference for genome-wide association studies, Hum Genet, vol.124, pp.439-50, 2008.

B. L. Browning and S. R. Browning, A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals, Am J Hum Genet, vol.84, pp.210-233, 2009.

H. Iwata and J. L. Jannink, Marker genotype imputation in a low-marker-density panel with a high-markerdensity reference panel: accuracy evaluation in barley breeding lines, Crop Sci, vol.50, pp.1269-78, 2010.

Z. Zhang and T. Druet, Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle, J Dairy Sci, vol.93, pp.5487-94, 2010.

J. M. Hickey, B. P. Kinghorn, B. Tier, J. H. Van-der-werf, and M. A. Cleveland, A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation, Genet Sel Evol, vol.44, p.9, 2012.

J. Duarte, R. O. Bates, C. W. Ernst, N. E. Raney, R. Cantet et al., Genotype imputation accuracy in a F2 pig population using high density and low density SNP panels, BMC Genet, vol.14, p.38, 2013.

Y. M. Badke, R. O. Bates, C. W. Ernst, J. Fix, and J. P. Steibel, Accuracy of estimation of genomic breeding values in pigs using low-density genotypes and imputation. G3 (Bethesda), vol.4, pp.623-654, 2014.

R. V. Ventura, D. Lu, F. S. Schenkel, Z. Wang, C. Li et al., Impact of reference population on accuracy of imputation from 6K to 50K single nucleotide polymorphism chips in purebred and crossbreed beef cattle

, J Anim Sci, vol.92, pp.1433-1477, 2014.

C. Hozé, M. N. Fouilloux, E. Venot, F. Guillaume, R. Dassonneville et al., High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds, Genet Sel Evol, vol.45, p.33, 2013.

O. F. Christensen, P. Madsen, B. Nielsen, T. Ostersen, and G. Su, Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs, Animal, vol.6, pp.1565-1571, 2012.

B. C. Cuyabano, G. Su, G. J. Rosa, M. S. Lund, and D. Gianola, Bootstrap study of genome-enabled prediction reliabilities using haplotype blocks across Nordic Red cattle breeds, J. Dairy Sci, vol.98, pp.7351-7363, 2015.

J. Dekkers, Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance, J. Anim. Sci, vol.85, pp.2104-2114, 2007.

M. Dufrasne, M. Rustin, V. Jaspart, J. Wavreile, and N. Gengler, Using test station and on-farm data for the genetic evaluation of Pietrain boars used on Landrace sows for growth performance, J. Anim. Sci, vol.89, pp.3872-3880, 2011.

H. Esfandyari, A. Sorensen, and P. Bijma, Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection, Genet Sel Evol, vol.47, p.16, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341295

D. S. Falconer, A note on Fisher's 'average effect' and 'average excess, Genet Res, vol.46, pp.337-347, 1985.

J. Fulton, Genomic selection for poultry breeding, Animal Frontiers, vol.2, pp.30-36, 2012.

H. Gao, O. F. Christensen, P. Madsen, U. S. Nielsen, Y. Zhang et al., Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population, Genet Sel Evol, vol.44, p.8, 2012.

L. A. García-cortés and M. Á. Toro, Multibreed analysis by splitting the breeding values, Genet Sel Evol, vol.38, pp.601-615, 2006.

. Geneseek, GGP-for Porcine LD (GeneSeek Genomic Profiler for Porcine Low Density), 2012.

X. Guo, O. F. Christensen, T. Ostersen, Y. Wang, M. S. Lund et al., Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method, J. Anim Sci, vol.93, pp.530-512, 2015.

N. Ibáñez-escriche, R. L. Fernando, A. Toosi, and J. C. Dekkers, Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance, Genet Sel Evol, vol.41, p.12, 2009.

A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, and I. Misztal, A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information, J. Dairy Sci, vol.92, pp.4656-4663, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02668784

L. L. Lo, R. L. Fernando, and M. Grossman, Covariance between relatives in multibreed populationsadditive-model, Theor Appl Genet, vol.87, pp.423-430, 1993.

L. L. Lo, R. L. Fernando, and M. Grossman, Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance, J. Anim Sci, vol.75, pp.2877-2884, 1997.

A. Loberg and J. W. Dürr, Interbull survey on the use of genomic information, Interbull Bulletin, vol.39, pp.3-14, 2009.

D. A. Lourenco, B. O. Fragomeni, S. Tsuruta, I. Aguilar, B. Zumbach et al.,

. Misztal, Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken, Genet Sel Evol, vol.47, p.56, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01340826

E. Lutaaya, I. Misztal, J. W. Mabry, T. Short, H. H. Timm et al., Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model, J. Anim Sci, vol.79, pp.3002-3007, 2001.

P. Madsen, DMU Trace, A program to trace the pedigree for a subset of animals from a large pedigree file. Version 2, 2012.

P. Madsen and J. Jensen, A user's guide to DMU. Version 6, release 5.2. Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Dept. of Molecular Biology and Genetics. Aarhus University, 2013.

E. A. Mäntysaari and M. Koivula, GEBV Validation Test Revisited. Interbull Bulletin, vol.45, pp.11-16, 2012.

I. Misztal and P. Løvendahl, Environmental Physiology of Livestock, 2012.

R. A. Mrode, Linear Models for the prediction of animal breeding values, CAB Int. Publ, 2005.

F. Pirchner and C. Vonkrosigk, Genetic parameters of cross-and purebred poultry, Brit Poultry Sci, vol.14, pp.193-202, 1973.

A. M. Ramos, R. P. Crooijmans, N. A. Affara, A. J. Amaral, A. L. Archibald et al., Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology, PloS one, vol.4, p.6524, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02665746

C. Spearman, The proof and measurement of association between two things, Amer. J. Psychol, vol.15, pp.72-101, 1904.

G. Su, P. Madsen, U. S. Nielsen, E. A. Mäntysaari, G. P. Aamand et al., Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending, J Dairy Sci, vol.95, pp.909-917, 2012.

P. M. Vanraden, C. P. Van-tassell, G. R. Wiggans, T. S. Sonstegard, R. D. Schnabel et al.,

. Schenkel, Invited Review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls, J. Dairy Sci, vol.92, pp.16-24, 2009.

M. Wei, Combined crossbred and purebred selection in animal breeding, 1992.

M. Wei and J. H. Van-der-werf, Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information, Anim Prod, vol.59, pp.401-413, 1994.

, Chapter, p.77

M. Wei and J. H. Van-der-werf, Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits, J. Anim Sci, vol.73, pp.2220-2226, 1995.

W. C. Wong, W. J. Boylan, and W. E. Rempel, Purebred versus crossbred performance as a basis of selection in swine, J. Anim Sci, vol.32, pp.605-610, 1971.

T. Xiang, P. Ma, T. Ostersen, A. Legarra, and O. F. Christensen, Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels, Genet Sel Evol, vol.47, p.54, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01339536

J. Zeng, A. Toosi, R. Fernando, J. Dekkers, and D. Garrick, Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action, Genet Sel Evol, vol.45, p.11, 2013.

J. W. Arnold, J. K. Bertrand, and L. L. Benyshek, Animal Model for Genetic Evaluation of Multibreed Data, J Anim Sci, vol.70, pp.3322-3354, 1992.

O. F. Christensen, Compatibility of pedigree-based and marker-based relationship matrices for singlestep genetic evaluation, Genet Sel Evol, vol.44, p.37, 2012.

O. F. Christensen and M. S. Lund, Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped, Genet Sel Evol, vol.42, issue.2, 2010.

O. F. Christensen, A. Legarra, M. S. Lund, and G. Su, Genetic evaluation for three-way crossbreeding, Genet Sel Evol, vol.47, p.98, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341332

C. C. Cockerham, Variance of gene frequencies, Evolution, vol.23, pp.72-84, 1969.

J. J. Colleau, An indirect approach to the extensive calculation of relationship coefficients, Genet Sel Evol, vol.34, pp.409-430, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02671236

D. S. Falconer and T. F. Mackay, Introduction to quantitative genetics, 1996.

N. S. Forneris, A. Legarra, Z. G. Vitezica, S. Tsuruta, I. Aguilar et al., Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker, Genetics, vol.199, pp.675-81, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02630879

C. A. García-baccino, A. Legarra, O. F. Christensen, I. Misztal, I. Pocrnic et al., Metafounders are related to Fst fixation indices and reduce bias in single-step genomic evaluations, Genet Sel Evol, vol.49, p.34, 2017.

L. A. García-cortés and M. Á. Toro, Multibreed analysis by splitting the breeding values, Genet Sel Evol, vol.38, pp.601-616, 2006.

N. Gengler, P. Mayeres, and M. Szydlowski, A simple method to approximate gene content in large pedigree populations: application to the myostatin gene in dual-purpose, Belgian Blue cattle. Animal, vol.1, pp.21-28, 2007.

S. Karoui, M. J. Carabaño, C. Díaz, and A. Legarra, Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models, Genet Sel Evol, vol.44, p.39, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02652575

B. W. Kennedy, CR Henderson: The unfinished legacy, J Dairy Sci, vol.74, pp.4067-81, 1991.

J. King, Pig breeds of the world:Their distributions and adaptation, pp.52-53, 1991.

A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, and I. Misztal, A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information, J Dairy Sci, vol.92, pp.4656-63, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02668784

A. Legarra, G. Baloche, F. Barillet, J. M. Astruc, C. Soulas et al., Within-and across-breed genomic predictions and genomic relationships for Western Pyrenees dairy sheep breeds Latxa, Manech, and Basco-Béarnaise, J Dairy Sci, vol.97, pp.3200-3212, 2014.

A. Legarra, O. F. Christensen, Z. G. Vitezica, I. Aguilar, and I. Misztal, Ancestral relationships using metafounders: finite ancestral populations and across population relationships, Genetics, vol.200, pp.455-68, 2015.

L. L. Lo, R. L. Fernando, and M. Grossman, Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance, J Anim Sci, vol.75, pp.2877-84, 1997.

E. Lutaaya, I. Misztal, J. W. Mabry, T. Short, H. H. Timm et al., Joint Evaluation of Purebreds and Crossbreds in Swine, J Anim Sci, vol.80, pp.2263-66

P. Madsen, DMU Trace, A program to trace the pedigree for a subset of animals from a large pedigree file. Version 2, 2012.

M. S. Mcpeek, X. Wu, and O. Carole, Best Linear Unbiased Allele-Frequency Estimation in Complex Pedigrees, Biometrics, vol.60, pp.359-67, 2004.

I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, T. Strabel, B. Auvray, T. Druet et al., BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In: 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 2002.

P. M. Vanraden, Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions, J Dairy Sci, vol.91, pp.4414-4437, 2008.

L. Van-vleck, Variance of prediction error with mixed model equations when relationships are ignored, Theor Appl Genet, vol.85, pp.545-594, 1993.

L. Wang, P. Sørensen, L. Janss, T. Ostersen, and D. Edwards, Genome-wide and local pattern of linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase for 3 Danish pig breeds, BMC Genet, vol.14, p.115, 2013.

M. Wei and J. H. Van-der-werf, Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information, Anim Prod, vol.59, pp.401-414, 1994.

M. Wei and J. Van-der-werf, Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information, Anim Sci, vol.59, pp.401-414, 1994.

P. Bijma and J. Bastiaansen, Standard error of the genetic correlation: how much data do we need to estimate a purebred-crossbred genetic correlation?, Genet Sel Evol, vol.46, p.79, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341252

M. Wei and H. Van-der-steen, Comparison of reciprocal recurrent selection with pure-line selection systems in animal breeding (a review), Anim Breeding Abs, vol.59, pp.281-98, 1991.

J. Dekkers, Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance, J Anim Sci, vol.85, pp.2104-2118, 2007.

L. L. Lo, R. L. Fernando, and M. Grossman, Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance, J Anim Sci, vol.75, pp.2877-84, 1997.

D. Charlesworth and J. H. Willis, The genetics of inbreeding depression, Nat Rev Genet, vol.10, pp.783-96, 2009.

D. S. Falconer and T. Mackay, Introduction to quantitative genetics, 1981.

G. Su, O. F. Christensen, T. Ostersen, M. Henryon, and M. S. Lund, Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers, PLoS One, vol.7, p.45293, 2012.

I. Misztal, L. Varona, M. Culbertson, J. K. Bertrand, J. Mabry et al., Studies on the value of incorporating the effect of dominance in genetic evaluations of dairy cattle, beef cattle and swine, Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ, vol.2, pp.227-260, 1998.

M. A. Toro and L. Varona, A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection, Genet Sel Evol, vol.42, p.33, 2010.

J. Ertl, A. Legarra, Z. G. Vitezica, L. Varona, C. Edel et al., Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle, Genet Sel Evol, vol.46, p.40, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341269

J. E. Fulton, Genomic selection for poultry breeding, Anim Front, vol.2, pp.30-36, 2012.

A. Loberg and J. W. Dürr, Interbull survey on the use of genomic information, Interbull Bull, vol.39, pp.3-14, 2009.

O. F. Christensen, A. Legarra, M. S. Lund, and G. Su, Genetic evaluation for three-way crossbreeding, Genet Sel Evol, vol.47, p.98, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341332

T. Xiang, B. Nielsen, G. Su, A. Legarra, and O. F. Christensen, Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig, J Anim Sci, vol.94, pp.936-984, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02740323

J. Zeng, A. Toosi, R. L. Fernando, J. Dekkers, and D. J. Garrick, Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action, Genet Sel Evol, vol.45, p.11, 2013.

H. Esfandyari, P. Bijma, M. Henryon, O. F. Christensen, and A. C. Sorensen, Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model, Genet Sel Evol, vol.48, p.40, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341374

A. M. Hidalgo, Exploiting genomic information on purebred and crossbred pigs, 2015.

N. Ibán?z-escriche, R. L. Fernando, A. Toosi, and J. Dekkers, Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance, Genet Sel Evol, vol.41, p.12, 2009.

Z. G. Vitezica, L. Varona, M. J. Elsen, I. Misztal, W. Herring et al., Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs, Genet Sel Evol, vol.48, p.6, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341340

P. Madsen and . Trace, A program to trace the pedigree for a subset of animals from a large pedigree file. Version 2. Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Dept. of Molecular Biology and Genetics. Aarhus University, 2012.

A. M. Ramos, R. P. Crooijmans, N. A. Affara, A. J. Amaral, A. L. Archibald et al., Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology, PLoS One, vol.4, p.6524, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02665746

G. Company, GGP-for Porcine LD (GeneSeek Genomic Profiler for Porcine Low Density, 2012.

S. R. Browning, Missing data imputation and haplotype phase inference for genome-wide association studies, Hum Genet, vol.124, pp.439-50, 2008.

L. Silió, M. Rodríguez, A. Fernández, C. Barragán, R. Benítez et al., Measuring inbreeding and inbreeding depression on pig growth from pedigree or SNP-derived metrics, J Anim Breed Genet, vol.130, pp.349-60, 2013.

M. Lynch and B. Walsh, Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, 1998.

I. De-boer and I. Hoeschele, Genetic evaluation methods for populations with dominance and inbreeding

, Theor Appl Genet, vol.86, pp.245-58, 1993.

H. Aliloo, J. E. Pryce, O. Gonzalez-recio, B. G. Cocks, and B. J. Hayes, Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits, Genet Sel Evol, vol.48, p.8, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341342

Z. G. Vitezica, L. Varona, and A. Legarra, On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope, Genetics, vol.195, pp.1223-1253, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02651726

I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, T. Strabel, B. Auvray, T. Druet et al.,

, Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: Montpellier, pp.19-23

P. Madsen and J. Jensen, A user's guide to DMU. Version 6, release 5.2. Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Dep. of Molecular Biology and Genetics, 2013.

P. M. Vanraden, Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions, J Dairy Sci, vol.91, pp.4414-4437, 2008.

D. Houle and K. Meyer, Estimating sampling error of evolutionary statistics based on genetic covariance matrices using maximum likelihood, J Evol Biol, vol.28, pp.1542-1551, 2015.

L. L. Lo, R. L. Fernando, and M. Grossman, Covariance between relatives in multibreed populations: additive model, Theor Appl Genet, 1993.

Y. C. Wientjes, R. F. Veerkamp, P. Bijma, H. Bovenhuis, C. Schrooten et al., Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection, Genet Sel Evol, vol.47, p.84, 2015.

T. Meuwissen and Z. Luo, Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations, Genet Sel Evol
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00893959

E. A. Mäntysaari and M. Koivula, GEBV validation test revisited, Interbull Bull, vol.45, pp.11-17, 2012.

M. S. Lopes, J. Bastiaansen, L. Janss, E. F. Knol, and H. Bovenhuis, Estimation of additive, dominance, and imprinting genetic variance using genomic data. G3 (Bethesda), vol.5, pp.2629-2666, 2015.

T. Meuwissen, B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard, Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps, Genetics, vol.157, pp.1819-1848, 2001.

A. M. Hidalgo, J. Bastiaansen, M. S. Lopes, B. Harlizius, M. Groenen et al., Accuracy of predicted genomic breeding values in purebred and crossbred pigs, G3 (Bethesda), vol.5, pp.1575-83, 2015.

N. Moghaddar, A. A. Swan, and J. H. Van-der-werf, Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep, Genet Sel Evol, vol.46, p.58, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341236

C. Sun, P. M. Vanraden, J. B. Cole, O. Connell, and J. R. , Improvement of prediction ability for genomic selection of dairy cattle by including dominance effects, PLoS One, vol.9, p.103934, 2014.

G. E. Dickerson, Inbreeding and heterosis in animals, Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in Honor of Jay L. Lush, pp.54-77, 1972.

G. Leroy, Inbreeding depression in livestock species: review and meta-analysis, Anim Genet, vol.45, pp.618-646, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01193843

L. Silió, C. Barragán, A. I. Fernández, J. García-casco, and M. C. Rodríguez, Assessing effective population size, coancestry and inbreeding effects on litter size using the pedigree and SNP data in closed lines of the Iberian pig breed, J Anim Breed Genet, vol.133, pp.145-54, 2016.

D. Hinrichs, T. Meuwissen, J. Ødegard, M. Holt, O. Vangen et al., Analysis of inbreeding depression in the first litter size of mice in a long-term selection experiment with respect to the age of the inbreeding, Heredity, 2007.

J. W. Bastiaansen, H. Bovenhuis, M. S. Lopes, F. Silva, H. J. Megens et al., Proceedings of the 10th World congress on genetics applied to livestock production, 2014.

P. Bijma and J. Bastiaansen, Standard error of the genetic correlation: how much data do we need to estimate a purebred-crossbred genetic correlation?, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.46, p.79, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341252

P. Bijma and J. Van-arendonk, Maximizing genetic gain for the sire line of a crossbreeding scheme utilizing both purebred and crossbred information, Animal Science, vol.66, pp.529-542, 1998.

O. F. Christensen, A. Legarra, M. S. Lund, and G. Su, Genetic evaluation for three-way crossbreeding, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.47, p.98, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341332

O. F. Christensen and M. S. Lund, Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.42, issue.2, 2010.

O. F. Christensen, P. Madsen, B. Nielsen, and G. Su, Genomic evaluation of both purebred and crossbred performances, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.46, p.23, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341227

S. M. Clarke, H. M. Henry, K. G. Dodds, T. W. Jowett, T. R. Manley et al., A high throughput single nucleotide polymorphism multiplex assay for parentage assignment in New Zealand sheep, PloS one, vol.9, issue.4, p.93392, 2014.

M. Cleveland and J. Hickey, Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation, Journal of Animal Science, vol.91, pp.3583-3592, 2013.

J. Dekkers, Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance, Journal of Animal Science, vol.85, pp.2104-2114, 2007.

M. Dufrasne, Genetic improvement of pig sire lines for production performances in crossbreeding, 2015.

H. Esfandyari, Genomic selection for crossbred performance, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341311

H. Esfandyari, A. C. Sorensen, and P. Bijma, A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.47, p.76, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341311

M. Eskildsen and A. V. Weber, Pig production, 2016.

E. Fernández, A. Legarra, R. Martínez, J. P. Sánchez, and M. Baselga, Estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines using an equivalent model, Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics : Accepted, 2017.

B. Hayes, P. Bowman, A. Chamberlain, and M. Goddard, Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.92, pp.433-443, 2009.

J. M. Hickey and A. Kranis, Extending long-range phasing and haplotype library imputation methods to impute genotypes on sex chromosomes, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.45, p.4, 2013.

A. M. Hidalgo, Exploiting genomic information on purebred and crossbred pigs, 2015.

Y. Huang, C. Maltecca, J. P. Cassady, L. J. Alexander, W. M. Snelling et al., Effects of reduced panel, reference origin, and genetic relationship on imputation of genotypes in Hereford cattle, Journal of Animal Science, vol.90, pp.4203-4208, 2012.

N. Ibán?z-escriche, R. Fernando, A. Toosi, and J. Dekkers, Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.41, p.12, 2009.

J. Johnston and G. Kistemaker, Success rate of imputation using different imputation approaches, 2011.

A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, and I. Misztal, A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.92, pp.4656-4663, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02668784

A. Legarra, O. F. Christensen, I. Aguilar, and I. Misztal, Single Step, a general approach for genomic selection, Livestock Science, vol.166, pp.54-65, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02635203

M. Lopes, Genomic selection for improved crossbred performance, 2016.

M. S. Lund, M. Puonti, L. Rydhmer, and J. Jensen, Relationship between litter size and perinatal and pre-weaning survival in pigs, Animal Science, vol.74, pp.217-239, 2002.

P. Ma, R. F. Brøndum, Q. Zhang, M. S. Lund, and G. Su, Comparison of different methods for imputing genome-wide marker genotypes in Swedish and Finnish Red Cattle, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.96, pp.4666-4677, 2013.

T. Meuwissen, B. Hayes, and M. Goddard, Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps, Genetics, vol.157, pp.1819-1829, 2001.

N. Moghaddar, K. P. Gore, H. D. Daetwyler, B. J. Hayes, and J. H. Werf, Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.47, p.97, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341331

W. Muir, Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters, Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, vol.124, pp.342-355, 2007.

M. Pszczola, T. Strabel, H. Mulder, and M. Calus, Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.95, pp.389-400, 2012.

M. Sargolzaei, J. Chesnais, and F. Schenkel, FImpute-An efficient imputation algorithm for dairy cattle populations, Journal of Dairy Science, vol.94, p.421, 2011.

C. A. Sevillano, J. Vandenplas, J. W. Bastiaansen, and M. P. Calus, Empirical determination of breedof-origin of alleles in three-breed cross pigs, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.48, p.55, 2016.

G. Su, M. S. Lund, and D. Sorensen, Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate, Journal of Animal Science, vol.85, pp.1385-1392, 2007.

G. Su, B. Guldbrandtsen, G. P. Aamand, I. Strandén, and M. S. Lund, Genomic relationships based on X chromosome markers and accuracy of genomic predictions with and without X chromosome markers, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.46, p.1, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341258

A. A. Swan, Multibreed evaluation procedures, 1992.

J. Vandenplas, M. P. Calus, C. A. Sevillano, J. J. Windig, and J. W. Bastiaansen, Assigning breed origin to alleles in crossbred animals, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.48, p.61, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01479286

R. Ventura, Accuracy of imputation to high density SNP data in multibreed beef cattle, Plant and Animal Genome XXI Conference, 2013.

Z. G. Vitezica, L. Varona, J. M. Elsen, I. Misztal, W. Herring et al., Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs, Genetics Selection Evolution, vol.48, p.6, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01341340

Z. G. Vitezica, L. Varona, and A. Legarra, On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope, Genetics, vol.195, pp.1223-1230, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02651726

M. Wei, Combined crossbred and purebred selection in animal breeding, 1992.

M. Wei and H. A. Steen, Comparison of reciprocal recurrent selection with pure-line selection systems in animal breeding (a review), Animal Breeding Abstracts, vol.59, pp.281-298, 1991.

M. Wei and J. Van-der-werf, Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information, Anim Prod, vol.59, pp.401-413, 1994.

M. Wei, J. H. Werf, and E. W. Brascamp, Relationship between purebred and crossbred parameters. 2. Genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance under the model with 2 loci, Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, vol.108, pp.262-269, 1991.

R. Wellmann and J. Bennewitz, Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits, Genetics Research, vol.94, pp.21-37, 2012.

C. /. Vancouver, , 2014.

, European Association of Animal Production, 2014.

, th European Association of Animal Production (EAAP) -Oral Warsaw, 2015.

, th European Association of Animal Production (EAAP) -Abstract, 2017.

, Seminars and workshop

, nd Genomic Selection in Animals and Plants, 2014.

, Workshop on Genomic selection in pigs -Oral, 2016.

, Séminaire des doctorants du métaprogramme SelGen -Poster, 2016.

, th Genomic Selection in Animals and Plants, 2016.